diff --git a/kb/communities/Synechococcus_Shewanella_Dlactate_Biophotovoltaic_Consortium.yaml b/kb/communities/Synechococcus_Shewanella_Dlactate_Biophotovoltaic_Consortium.yaml index 45c58082..b89c21eb 100644 --- a/kb/communities/Synechococcus_Shewanella_Dlactate_Biophotovoltaic_Consortium.yaml +++ b/kb/communities/Synechococcus_Shewanella_Dlactate_Biophotovoltaic_Consortium.yaml @@ -226,6 +226,49 @@ ecological_interactions: evidence_source: IN_VITRO snippet: temporal/spatial separation design conquered the physiological incompatibility explanation: Supports the spatial-temporal device organization as the compatibility mechanism. +cultivation_setup: +- cultivation_mode: BATCH + system_type: BIOELECTROCHEMICAL_SYSTEM + instrument_detail: >- + Dual-chamber electrochemical devices on M9 medium, used to compare current production + from monocultures against the consortium. The cyanobacterium charges the system in the + light by making d-lactate; Shewanella discharges it in the dark by oxidising that + d-lactate to the anode. The consortium sustained electricity production for over 40 days. + electrode_detail: >- + Anode-respiring: the engineered S. oneidensis releases electrons from d-lactate and + transfers them to the anode. No applied potential is recorded because the paper reports + power output rather than poised-potential operation. + notes: >- + Light and dark are the operating cycle, not a condition. Charging and discharging are run + sequentially under light and dark, and the paper's own attempt to run the consortium under + continuous light failed - it produced no current, because photosynthetic oxygen raised + dissolved oxygen and Shewanella is itself light-sensitive. Recording an illumination + setting as a single value would flatten the finding into a parameter. + + `cultivation_mode` is BATCH because the devices are charged and discharged rather than + fed and drained; no dilution or feed rate is reported. + + The LB at 30 °C elsewhere in the paper is the S. oneidensis preculture, not the + consortium, and is deliberately not recorded here (#529). + evidence: + - reference: PMID:31537786 + supports: SUPPORT + evidence_source: IN_VITRO + snippet: Dual-chamber electrochemical devices (Supplementary Fig. 14a, b) were used to evaluate + the efficiency of current production in mono-cultures and microbial consortia in this study + explanation: The vessel, stated for the consortium as well as the monocultures. + - reference: PMID:31537786 + supports: SUPPORT + evidence_source: IN_VITRO + snippet: The charging process (photosynthetic production of d-lactate) and discharging process + are implemented sequentially under light and dark conditions, respectively + explanation: The light/dark cycle is the operating regime, which is why it is not a field. + - reference: PMID:31537786 + supports: SUPPORT + evidence_source: IN_VITRO + snippet: can produce relatively high-power electricity from light for over 40 days + explanation: Duration the consortium was operated for. + environmental_factors: - name: Light-driven charging phase value: Continuous illumination with 3 percent carbon dioxide for cyanobacterial D-lactate production