diff --git a/kb/communities/Cyprus_Copper_Sulphide_Bioleaching_Consortium.yaml b/kb/communities/Cyprus_Copper_Sulphide_Bioleaching_Consortium.yaml
index 40dd4f33..0bafc010 100644
--- a/kb/communities/Cyprus_Copper_Sulphide_Bioleaching_Consortium.yaml
+++ b/kb/communities/Cyprus_Copper_Sulphide_Bioleaching_Consortium.yaml
@@ -190,6 +190,51 @@ ecological_interactions:
       conjugal transfer genes found in the same genus, likely belonging to
       another plasmid, evidence of intra-plasmid competition
     explanation: Supports the CRISPR-spacer-based plasmid competition.
+cultivation_setup:
+- cultivation_mode: BATCH
+  operating_temperature: 28.0
+  operating_temperature_unit: °C
+  instrument_detail: >-
+    The consortium was sampled from packed bioleaching column SC3 at the Skouriotissa Mine in
+    Cyprus, then maintained in the laboratory: incubated at 28 °C without agitation and
+    sub-cultured ten times at 5% inoculum every two months in MAM with 0.25 g of unsterilised
+    research-grade chalcopyrite. It was then split and sub-cultured onto chalcocite as well as
+    chalcopyrite, since the mineral is the variable the study is about.
+  notes: >-
+    The mineral is in the setup rather than only among environmental factors because it is
+    the substrate the community is grown on and the experimental variable at once - the whole
+    question is how mineral type drives composition. It is also deliberately unsterilised,
+    which is a choice about what the community is allowed to encounter.
+
+    Static, and worth recording for the same reason as the thermophilic cellulose and TCE
+    records: a mineral-attached acidophile consortium is grown on a settled solid surface, so
+    "without agitation" is a design decision rather than an omission.
+
+    No `system_type` or `working_volume`. The source names neither the vessel nor the fill for
+    the sub-cultures; the packed column it came from is the field source, not the laboratory
+    setup, and recording it would describe where the community was found rather than how it
+    was grown.
+
+    Third of the three "likely curatable" predictions in #543, and it holds - but only just.
+    The community originates in a column at a mine, which is exactly the shape that made
+    Avena_Rhizosphere unenrichable. What separates them is that this one was then carried into
+    the laboratory and propagated for ten passages; the sampling is the origin, the
+    sub-culturing is the cultivation.
+  evidence:
+  - reference: PMID:41381092
+    supports: SUPPORT
+    evidence_source: IN_VITRO
+    snippet: Before the experiment, the microbial enrichment was incubated at 28°C without agitation
+      and sub‐cultured 10 times with a 5% inoculum every 2 months in MAM with 0.25 g unsterilized
+      research grade chalcopyrite
+    explanation: Temperature, static operation, transfer regime, medium and mineral substrate.
+  - reference: PMID:41381092
+    supports: SUPPORT
+    evidence_source: IN_VITRO
+    snippet: microbial consortia from a copper bioleaching column in Cyprus were cultivated on
+      chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) and then sub‐cultured on chalcocite (Cu2S) and chalcopyrite
+    explanation: The community was cultivated in the laboratory, and the mineral was varied.
+
 environmental_factors:
 - name: Mineral substrate
   value: chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) and chalcocite (Cu2S)