From review of #14.
The lecture description calls MicroGrowAgents "a hierarchical agentic-AI framework of 100+ specialist agents". The page documents four agents (LiteratureAgent, AnalogyReasoningAgent, GenomeFunctionAgent, MediaFormulationAgent).
#14 reconciles these by presenting the four as "principal roles" at the top of the hierarchy. Nothing in the source says that. It is a guess that makes both numbers true. The alternatives are equally consistent with the evidence:
- the four are one layer of a larger hierarchy, but not necessarily the top;
- the four are outdated and have been superseded by the 100+;
- the 100+ counts instances of the four types rather than distinct specialists.
Needs confirmation from someone who knows the architecture (the repo is private, so this cannot be checked from outside). Until then the page should describe both figures without asserting a structure between them.
From review of #14.
The lecture description calls MicroGrowAgents "a hierarchical agentic-AI framework of 100+ specialist agents". The page documents four agents (LiteratureAgent, AnalogyReasoningAgent, GenomeFunctionAgent, MediaFormulationAgent).
#14 reconciles these by presenting the four as "principal roles" at the top of the hierarchy. Nothing in the source says that. It is a guess that makes both numbers true. The alternatives are equally consistent with the evidence:
Needs confirmation from someone who knows the architecture (the repo is private, so this cannot be checked from outside). Until then the page should describe both figures without asserting a structure between them.