From f5765e7a934c6fedc2c11a46cd558bcdc273f49d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sandeepa Nadahalli <1698507+snadahalli@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 14:08:25 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] docs(airplay): point pair_probe at #27 rather than the
 split-up #8
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

#8 bundled two unrelated problems and was closed when #28 split it: the
FairPlay half became a settled decision recorded in `docs/crypto.md`, and the
half that is still open — whether HAP transient pairing works against real
hardware — became #27.

`pair_probe` exists solely to answer that open half, but both its module doc
and the failure hint it prints still cite #8, so anyone following the pointer
lands on a closed issue whose FairPlay half is explicitly out of scope.
---
 crates/openplay-airplay/examples/pair_probe.rs | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/crates/openplay-airplay/examples/pair_probe.rs b/crates/openplay-airplay/examples/pair_probe.rs
index 18b881f..2c27d5c 100644
--- a/crates/openplay-airplay/examples/pair_probe.rs
+++ b/crates/openplay-airplay/examples/pair_probe.rs
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 //! Probes a real AirPlay receiver: feature negotiation, then HAP pair-setup.
 //!
 //! This is the hardware check that no unit test in this repository can perform.
-//! It exists to answer the open question in issue #8 — whether the corrected
+//! It exists to answer the open question in issue #27 — whether the corrected
 //! RFC 5054 SRP group actually lets `pair_setup` succeed against real Apple
 //! hardware, rather than merely removing a known blocker.
 //!
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ async fn main() -> anyhow::Result<()> {
         }
         Err(e) => {
             println!("\n❌ PAIR-SETUP FAILED: {e}");
-            println!("\n   Where it failed is what matters for issue #8:");
+            println!("\n   Where it failed is what matters for issue #27:");
             println!("   - 'Server proof verification failed' (M4) → SRP still disagrees");
             println!("   - missing salt/public key (M2)            → receiver refused earlier");
             println!("   - TLV8 error code in M4                   → receiver rejected the PIN");