The round-trip adds structure the baseline does not have. Every other finding in the catalog run is loss; this is the only additive one.
Evidence
FormGroupHeading:
| path |
baseline |
round-trip |
anatomy.labelRow |
(absent) |
{type: container, detectedIn: "custom=true, role=H3"} |
default.elements.labelRow |
(absent) |
full styles block (layout mode, wrap, sizing, itemSpacing) |
variants[1].layout |
(absent) |
[{root: [{children: [{labelRow: [heading, requiredIndicator]}]}]}] |
The added element nests existing elements (heading, requiredIndicator) beneath it, so the layout tree gains a level.
Fixtures
FormGroupHeading — the only clear instance in the catalog
variants[*].layout differences appear in 6 aligned components and may share this cause, but they were not individually characterised and should not be assumed related.
Where
Undetermined. Whether the render creates a wrapper that was not in the spec, or the read invents one from the rendered structure, is not established.
Caveat
This component also has a variant-count mismatch (1 → 3), covered by the variant-count investigation issue. Resolve that first — some of the added structure may be misalignment rather than invention.
Part of #281.
The round-trip adds structure the baseline does not have. Every other finding in the catalog run is loss; this is the only additive one.
Evidence
FormGroupHeading:anatomy.labelRow{type: container, detectedIn: "custom=true, role=H3"}default.elements.labelRowvariants[1].layout[{root: [{children: [{labelRow: [heading, requiredIndicator]}]}]}]The added element nests existing elements (
heading,requiredIndicator) beneath it, so the layout tree gains a level.Fixtures
FormGroupHeading— the only clear instance in the catalogvariants[*].layoutdifferences appear in 6 aligned components and may share this cause, but they were not individually characterised and should not be assumed related.Where
Undetermined. Whether the render creates a wrapper that was not in the spec, or the read invents one from the rendered structure, is not established.
Caveat
This component also has a variant-count mismatch (1 → 3), covered by the variant-count investigation issue. Resolve that first — some of the added structure may be misalignment rather than invention.
Part of #281.