Create new label for ResampleBenchmark

[phcerdan]

The new benchmark contributed by @dpshamonin is really great, but takes long time, I think it deserves its own label, instead of integrating it with Filtering, these are the result with everything enabled:

Label Time Summary:
Core                       =   0.03 sec*proc (1 test)
Filtering                  = 285.63 sec*proc (65 tests)
PerformanceBenchmarking    =   0.19 sec*proc (6 tests)
Registration               =   8.38 sec*proc (3 tests)
Segmentation               =  27.36 sec*proc (4 tests)

[thewtex]

👍 good idea. A new CTest label and disabled by default so testing time is reasonable by default. This is important for exploring performance changes.

[blowekamp]

We should select at least 2-4 common or interesting cases which should still be enabled by default.

[dzenanz]

Yes, we should have the few quickest running tests on by default.

[blowekamp]

Yes, we should have the few quickest running tests on by default.

Hmm, perhaps there are two things. There are the Tests which are run by the CI by default and then there is the performance profile done by the diver. Perhaps the different purpose dictates difference defaults.