Which inference path did you use?
Other
Inference parameters
No response
Prompt / input
leaking into minimax-m3 response content
Expected behavior
Bug Report: Raw internal tool-call tokens (]<]minimax[>[) leaking into minimax-m3 response content
Actual behavior
when i coding with minimax m3 some times got this and stop chat , some times got continuously
minimax m3 ai:
Let me read that part to confirm.
I need to continue with Step 1. Let me read the run_one function to find where to add the state initialization Tuner.]<]minimax[>[<tool_call>
]<]minimax[>[]<]minimax[>[C:\encher\src\main.rs]<]minimax[>[]<]minimax[>[<start_line>130]<]minimax[>[</start_line>]<]minimax[>[<end_line>165]<]minimax[>[</end_line>]<]minimax[>[
]<]minimax[>[</tool_call>
Additional context
##################
i ask with it claude , say:
Bug Report (from claude): Raw internal tool-call tokens (]<]minimax[>[) leaking into minimax-m3 response content (
Summary
When using the minimax-m3 model through the Kilo Gateway / Kimchi API (OpenAI-compatible chat/completions endpoint), the model's internal tool-call boundary tokens (]<]minimax[>[) sometimes leak directly into the visible message.content field instead of being parsed into a proper structured tool_calls array. This produces garbled, unusable output on the client side and causes the calling application (an AI coding agent) to stall or fail mid-task.
Environment
- Model:
minimax-m3 (accessed as kimchi/minimax-m3 via Kilo Gateway)
- Endpoint:
/v1/chat/completions (OpenAI-compatible), both streaming and non-streaming
- Client: OpenAI-compatible coding agent (opencode), via a local proxy that otherwise forwards requests unmodified
- Frequency: Intermittent — occurs "suddenly" and sometimes repeats for multiple consecutive requests before stopping
Expected behavior
When the model wants to invoke a tool/function, the response should contain a properly structured tool_calls array:
{
"choices": [{
"message": {
"role": "assistant",
"content": null,
"tool_calls": [{
"id": "call_...",
"type": "function",
"function": { "name": "...", "arguments": "{...}" }
}]
}
}]
}
Actual behavior
The model's raw internal boundary/delimiter tokens appear directly in message.content as plain text, wrapping what looks like an internal tool-call payload that was never converted into the structured format.
Reproduction examples (captured from live responses)
Example:
Debug derive conflict (BlendMode already has Debug). Fix:]<]minimax[>[ ]<]minimax[>[]<]minimax[>[C:\Users\yumin\Desktop\other\no\cons\tun\src\lib.rs]<]minimax[>[]<]minimax[>[/// Selected configuration for one scene.
#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, Debug)]
pub struct ConfigChoice { ... }
]<]minimax[>[]<]minimax[>[cargo test --release --manifest-path "..." --lib 2>&1 | grep -E "(test result|FAILED|error)" | head -10]<]minimax[>[]<]minimax[><]minimax[>[]<]minimax[>[
Observations
- The ]<]minimax[>[ sequence appears to function as an internal delimiter marking the boundaries of a tool call (target file path, code diff/content, and a shell command each appear as separate segments between markers).
- In Example 1, the payload between markers matches the shape of a code-edit tool call: file path → old/new code content → a test command → a numeric value (possibly a timeout in ms).
- This occurs on both streaming and non-streaming requests.
- Client-side retries of the same request sometimes succeed with a properly formatted tool_calls response, suggesting this is non-deterministic / load- or path-dependent on the gateway or model-serving side rather than a fixed per-request issue.
Impact
- Any client relying on structured
tool_calls (coding agents, function-calling integrations) receives unusable output and cannot execute the intended action.
- Silent failures: there is no error status/code returned — the response is
200 OK with malformed content, so clients that don't specifically pattern-match for this can't distinguish it from a legitimate (if unusual) text response.
Suggested fix directions
- Ensure the tool-call parsing/finalization step on the gateway (or model-serving layer) always converts these internal delimiter-wrapped segments into the structured
tool_calls field before returning the response, for both streaming and non-streaming paths.
- If the delimiter tokens are ever unparseable for some segments, return an explicit error (e.g.
finish_reason: "content_filter" or a 5xx) rather than 200 OK with raw tokens in content, so clients can detect and retry deterministically instead of silently receiving garbage.
- Investigate why this is intermittent — whether it correlates with specific prompt/tool-schema shapes, concurrent load, or a specific upstream replica/version of
minimax-m3.
Which inference path did you use?
Other
Inference parameters
No response
Prompt / input
Expected behavior
Bug Report: Raw internal tool-call tokens (]<]minimax[>[) leaking into minimax-m3 response content
Actual behavior
when i coding with minimax m3 some times got this and stop chat , some times got continuously
minimax m3 ai:
Let me read that part to confirm.
I need to continue with Step 1. Let me read the run_one function to find where to add the state initialization Tuner.]<]minimax[>[<tool_call>
]<]minimax[>[]<]minimax[>[C:\encher\src\main.rs]<]minimax[>[]<]minimax[>[<start_line>130]<]minimax[>[</start_line>]<]minimax[>[<end_line>165]<]minimax[>[</end_line>]<]minimax[>[
]<]minimax[>[</tool_call>
Additional context
##################
i ask with it claude , say:
Bug Report (from claude): Raw internal tool-call tokens (
]<]minimax[>[) leaking intominimax-m3response content (Summary
When using the
minimax-m3model through the Kilo Gateway / Kimchi API (OpenAI-compatiblechat/completionsendpoint), the model's internal tool-call boundary tokens (]<]minimax[>[) sometimes leak directly into the visiblemessage.contentfield instead of being parsed into a proper structuredtool_callsarray. This produces garbled, unusable output on the client side and causes the calling application (an AI coding agent) to stall or fail mid-task.Environment
minimax-m3(accessed askimchi/minimax-m3via Kilo Gateway)/v1/chat/completions(OpenAI-compatible), both streaming and non-streamingExpected behavior
When the model wants to invoke a tool/function, the response should contain a properly structured
tool_callsarray:{ "choices": [{ "message": { "role": "assistant", "content": null, "tool_calls": [{ "id": "call_...", "type": "function", "function": { "name": "...", "arguments": "{...}" } }] } }] }Actual behavior
The model's raw internal boundary/delimiter tokens appear directly in
message.contentas plain text, wrapping what looks like an internal tool-call payload that was never converted into the structured format.Reproduction examples (captured from live responses)
Example:
Observations
Impact
tool_calls(coding agents, function-calling integrations) receives unusable output and cannot execute the intended action.200 OKwith malformed content, so clients that don't specifically pattern-match for this can't distinguish it from a legitimate (if unusual) text response.Suggested fix directions
tool_callsfield before returning the response, for both streaming and non-streaming paths.finish_reason: "content_filter"or a5xx) rather than200 OKwith raw tokens incontent, so clients can detect and retry deterministically instead of silently receiving garbage.minimax-m3.