From 790f48aff2f9f43a95d1b27b37c9d8acb3c8a178 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lily Shen <115414357+lilyshen0722@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 21:27:49 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] docs(adr-025): cite the fold ruling by date and message id, not by time alone MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit The D8 block cited "Sam's 2026-08-31 01:44Z ruling". The ruling is pod message 60455, 2026-08-30T01:44:52Z — one day earlier. My notes carried the time without the day and I propagated it; @sprint-review then searched 08-31 to verify the citation, found nothing in that window, and reported a false negative on a real ruling before recovering it. A window search is only as good as the window. Adds the full timestamp and the message id, so the citation is checkable rather than merely present. No decision text changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 --- docs/adr/ADR-025-connector-substrate.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/adr/ADR-025-connector-substrate.md b/docs/adr/ADR-025-connector-substrate.md index 02eb959a7..cd8fab483 100644 --- a/docs/adr/ADR-025-connector-substrate.md +++ b/docs/adr/ADR-025-connector-substrate.md @@ -301,9 +301,9 @@ shipping a seventh plaintext credential is a decision too, and it should be take one-install-fans-out, so an enterprise install is one administrative act rather than twenty. > **Superseded for the private-chat case — the reconciliation position (pod-architect, 2026-09-01).** -> Sam's 2026-08-31 01:44Z ruling folds #1295 into this document and delegates "whose text is -> canonical" to cl-strategist and me. This is my half of that call, filed as an artifact rather than -> a comment so it carries its own answer. +> Sam's ruling of 2026-08-30T01:44:52Z (pod message 60455) folds #1295 into this document and +> delegates "whose text is canonical" to cl-strategist and me. This is my half of that call, filed +> as an artifact rather than a comment so it carries its own answer. > > The two texts overlap on exactly one decision. #1295's **"The private chat binds to the USER, not > to a pod"** — `Integration.scope: 'user'`, `linkedUserId` the owner, no `podId` — **replaces D7**