PBN format
#281
Replies: 1 comment
|
Nice catch! I'll think about what we should do about it. Seems right for us to recognize both formats, if we don't already. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi,
in the section https://github.com/dds-bridge/dds/blob/develop/docs/python_interface.md you mention the PBN format is
"N:AK.234.456.789TJQ W:QJ.AKQJ.789.234 E:T9.T9.TJ.AK S:8765.8765.AKQJ32.6"
According to the defintion of the PBN format as given here:
https://www.tistis.nl/pbn/pbn_v21.txt
this is not quite correct. Only the position of the first seat is given, the rest is taken in a clockwise direction. So the above PBN should read instead:
"N:AK.234.456.789TJQ QJ.AKQJ.789.234 T9.T9.TJ.AK 8765.8765.AKQJ32.6"
The former format is e.g. not recognized by John Goachers dds application but the latter is.
Klaus
All reactions