Skip to content

Alternative renderers #77

Description

@ralsina

I have implemented a couple of alternative renderers, specifically:

  • markdown -> terminal
  • markdown -> markdown

I have code that should make it trivial to write a couple more (PNG and SVG) and I have "plans" for a PDF renderer (that supports HTML, will be fun!).

Those are currently in my markterm project. Would there be interest in adding them to markd itself?

Pros:

  • Having more than one renderer in core helps abstract the base renderer at the proper level
  • Maybe someone needs them (unlikely)

Cons:

  • Makes markd larger and it's not like there's an abundance of person-power
  • Makes advancing the HTML renderer harder

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions