Skip to content

IGD+ computation in jMetalPy much slower than moocore #188

@MLopez-Ibanez

Description

@MLopez-Ibanez

I tried to benchmark the IGD+ code in jMetalPy against the same function moocore but jMetalPy seems between 100-1000 times slower. You can see my benchmarking code here: https://github.com/multi-objective/moocore/blob/main/python/benchmarks/bench_igdplus.py

Note that moocore also provides AHD: https://multi-objective.github.io/moocore/python/reference/functions.metrics.html#inverted-generational-distance-igd-and-igd-and-averaged-hausdorff-distance

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions