Update benchmark results for `wasmi`

[vshymanskyy]

According to https://wasmi-labs.github.io/blog/posts/wasmi-v0.32
wasmi-v0.32 should display much better results

It would be nice to see the updated numbers. Cheers!

@ejpbruel2 @Robbepop

[Robbepop]

I benchmarked using Macbook M2 Pro with Wasmi v0.40.0 using Wasmi benchmarks suite on Coremark.
(Note that Wasmi is known to perform badly on Mac.)

I used the following optimization profile:

[profile.release]
opt-level = 3
lto = "fat"
codegen-units = 1

Runtime	Coremark
wasmer	12725
wasmtime	12724
stitch	3051
wasm3	2919
wamr	~2300
wasmi v0.40	2048
pulley	~1700
wasmi v0.31	890
tinywasm	493

Furthermore the compilation time benchmarks are incorrect as Wasmi compiles in ~5s and not in ~15s. The only explanation for those displayed ~15s that I have is that wasmi_cli was compiled which is an unfair comparison and wasmi crate should be used instead since makepad-stitch is also a library and not a CLI tool.