Skip to content

Microflow roundtrip stabilization for large-project audit findings #332

@hjotha

Description

@hjotha

Summary

While running describe/exec/describe audits against large Mendix projects and validating round-tripped MPRs with mx check, I found a second batch of related microflow roundtrip gaps. Several small fixes are already open as focused PRs; the remaining items are tracked below and staged in draft PR #346 while they are extracted into reviewable changes.

Opening this as an umbrella issue, following the pattern from #257, so the remaining work has one tracker while each PR stays focused and reviewable.

Already submitted focused PRs

Staging PR

Remaining focused issues

Proposed PR workflow

  • Each merge-ready PR should stay one concern or one tightly coupled feature/fix.
  • New syntax PRs include proposal docs, mdl-examples/doctype-tests, quick reference, and skill notes.
  • PRs use synthetic fixtures only; no private project names or microflow names.
  • Validation per PR: make build, make lint-go, make test; make test-integration and/or mx check where behavior touches MPR validity.

Notes

This issue is a tracker, not a request to merge one large PR. Draft PR #346 intentionally does not close this issue.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions