Skip to content

v3 C4: budget-compliant sequential fusion BM25→EGO #249

Description

@nikolay-e

Thesis

v2's union overshoots the budget on 8.5% of instances. The sequential variant (BM25 → EGO on the remainder) is described in v2 but never measured; in v3 it and calibrated fusion are the main rows of the table.

Implementation

Two pipeline calls: the second with budget = B − used₁ and the first pass's selected paths excluded from the candidate set. Trivial over the existing pipeline.

Honesty requirement

Two passes = double cost. Report wall-clock p50/p90 as a table column, not a footnote — this is an argument of the table.

Cross-refs: #241 (--budget is not a hard cap: cores bypass it) and #238 (per-file budget share) both distort "budget-compliant" claims and are prerequisites.

Q-class. Matrix cell 10.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions