docs(pm): runbook step that pastes the decision frame into every dispatch prompt (#15057)

The internal dispatch runbook constructed the dispatch prompt without ever
naming the four-axis decision frame. After the batch-3 item-4 ruling (option B,
2026-09-03) the dev definition expects the frame to arrive in the prompt from
the PM's own copy and stops and asks when it does not, so the runbook was an
instruction surface promising a behaviour it no longer produced -- one
round-trip per dispatch until the step is written down.

Adds one bullet to the clause list of the dispatch-prompt construction section,
beside the "two readings handed down at dispatch" clause it belongs with: the
internal-pm frame section is taken fresh and pasted verbatim per card, from
`.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md`, delimited by its two anchor sentences;
never retyped; the brief records the copy's commit and md5; the os-dev
definition stops and asks when the frame is missing.

The frame text itself is NOT copied -- the bullet points at the existing copy by
its anchors, so `check:skill-frame-sync` keeps watching exactly two copies.

Line ratchet: 276 -> 280 of the 280 ceiling; no ceiling edit, no re-wrap, no
cross-file move needed.


Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_019RfFHiRCSs3JXLK4cwcfox

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: os-steve

.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/dispatch-runbook.md

@@ -240,6 +240,10 @@ monitor 按自己的 deadline 触发;身份 = 三元组 `(issue, 分支, PR head
   点名单当天现取仍会漏(实测漏的门恰被改动打红过)—— dev 对实际改动路径重取补跑。
   ② **去重/看板读数**:取一次(查询式 + 时间戳)整批共用,
   派发令写「当既有事实用,只复核其后的增量,⛔ 不重跑」。dev 侧对价住 os-dev 定义。
+- **决策框架整段现取现粘、逐单随派发词下发**(维护者 2026-09-03 裁):内部 PM 副本在
+  `.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md`,自「每个方案必须沿四条固定评估轴分析…」
+  至「推荐意见必须基于这四条轴给出理由…」逐字粘贴,⛔ 不重打、⛔ 不另立第三份副本
+  (`check:skill-frame-sync` 拒);派发词记该副本的 commit 与 md5,os-dev 定义没带就停下索取。
 - **文件面两句原文**:「预期落点是 X;若实测表明真正的生产者在别包,报备后按生产者侧修
   (落点与理由写进报告和 PR 正文),⛔ 不在消费者侧打补丁」—— 只写一个路径名,
   是要求 dev 在守约与修对之间二选一;跨包常等于跨车道,PM 事后补跨座位声明。