Commit 4178886
docs(pm-dispatch): name what IS and is NOT build-tier evidence in the fuse
`references/contract-review.md` 〈降档保险丝(机读)〉 said how a seat's own
served tier is READ, and that a self-description is not a reading — it never
said which artefacts are NOT tier evidence. A commit trailer carries a model
string, so a reader who has not seen the AGENTS.md model-free trailer rule
takes it for a tier stamp. That misread once held a PR and cost a withdrawal.
Adds one line under that section carrying both halves: the two admissible
sources for the tier the work was BUILT at (the harness `model` stamps; the
claim's `Container & model:` line) and the exclusion (the `Co-Authored-By`
trailer is a session-attribution constant, never evidence of tier).
The file sits at its ratchet ceiling (60/60, headroom 0), so the added line is
paid by a deletion inside the file — never a re-wrap and never a ceiling raise.
The deleted line is the 外部评审链 bullet in 复核归属与资格, whose rule is
already stated in `SKILL.md` (「外部评审链降为可选事后审计,非放行前提。」) and
whose two named chains are stated in `references/lanes/director.md`, where the
duties of those chains live. The rules-only rewrite convention for this corpus
is one rule per line and no rule already stated in SKILL.md, so the bullet was
a restatement — the ratchet's own header had already classified it as one.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MoTv7pn338AZ71owsp19gQ
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>1 parent c3756ff commit 4178886
1 file changed
Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
44 | 44 | | |
45 | 45 | | |
46 | 46 | | |
47 | | - | |
48 | 47 | | |
49 | 48 | | |
50 | 49 | | |
| |||
54 | 53 | | |
55 | 54 | | |
56 | 55 | | |
| 56 | + | |
57 | 57 | | |
58 | 58 | | |
59 | 59 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments