Commit 873ff0f
skills(pm): give sweep disjunct ① the drain clauses the finding box already has (#14152)
* skills(pm): give sweep disjunct ① the drain clauses the finding box already has
Disjunct ① (bare cards: no pm:*, no needs-user-decision, no domain:*) had a
stock query and nothing that drains it, and its ordering rule 「新入卡①优先最新」
inverts into tail starvation the moment intake exceeds throughput.
Three clauses land in the sweep paragraph, one home each:
- first-touch grading every round, budget 3–5 stated as a CEILING not a quota
(a bare card costs more per unit than a finding: full read + route + grade
+ type);
- the ordering rule REPLACED: newest-first while the queue clears each round,
oldest-first the moment it does not, with the inversion rationale inline;
- bare count > 15 ⇒ the next fire runs a domain-batched concentrated round of
15–20 cards per ROUND (not per batch — batches stay ≤5 same-family per the
standing convention), with the pair rationale written in: the threshold
absorbs bursts, the budget drains steady state, neither substitutes.
The round brief's health indicators go from four to five: bare count + median
age join the finding line. The runbook's hourly-tier reading recipe records the
one exception the new indicator creates — a label-absence population has no
totalCount to read, so it comes from the round's own disjunct-① enumeration.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Msg17tAHJ3jVTYFgHydCm2
* skills(pm): drop the disjunct-① total cap for the sibling's run-to-empty shape
The at-tier compensating review found two blocking items against the numbers
the seat adjudicated, on two independent grounds.
1. The concentrated round's 15–20 per-round total re-created 封顶总量 — the
exact category the 2026-08-25 run-to-empty ruling retired for the sibling
box (⛔ 无每轮总量预算 … 不靠封顶总量 … 单轮数小时是可接受形态 … 下一 fire
从断点续跑). It would also have forbidden the maintainer's own 40-card
round, which is the existence proof the clause rests on. The trigger,
域分批 and 每批 ≤5 stay; the size cap becomes run-to-empty, window-bounded,
resuming from the breakpoint on the next fire — the sibling's post-ruling
wording.
2. 「预算 3–5 张是上限不是配额 …清得动就多清、清不动不欠」 carried two
mutually exclusive instructions, and the conservative reading is the
chronic-under-clear hazard. The numeric ceiling is gone; the per-unit cost
parenthetical is repositioned as the reason bare rounds run LONG — which
the ruling accepts — rather than a reason to cap. No calibration number is
kept: on a population that has needed 9, 13 and 40 cleared in a round, a
「常态 3–5」 anchors low in precisely the direction the review flagged.
With both fixed, 「与发现箱同构」 is now literally true (metric + run-to-empty
drain + threshold), so the parenthetical says which three parts are shared and
names the ordering rule as this population's own addition. The pair rationale
survives with its terms updated: the threshold absorbs bursts by switching the
next fire into domain-batched mode, run-to-empty drains steady state.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Msg17tAHJ3jVTYFgHydCm2
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>1 parent da839ba commit 873ff0f
2 files changed
Lines changed: 19 additions & 5 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
344 | 344 | | |
345 | 345 | | |
346 | 346 | | |
347 | | - | |
348 | | - | |
| 347 | + | |
| 348 | + | |
| 349 | + | |
| 350 | + | |
| 351 | + | |
| 352 | + | |
| 353 | + | |
| 354 | + | |
| 355 | + | |
| 356 | + | |
| 357 | + | |
| 358 | + | |
| 359 | + | |
349 | 360 | | |
350 | 361 | | |
351 | 362 | | |
| |||
790 | 801 | | |
791 | 802 | | |
792 | 803 | | |
793 | | - | |
| 804 | + | |
794 | 805 | | |
795 | 806 | | |
796 | 807 | | |
797 | | - | |
| 808 | + | |
| 809 | + | |
| 810 | + | |
798 | 811 | | |
799 | 812 | | |
800 | 813 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
89 | 89 | | |
90 | 90 | | |
91 | 91 | | |
92 | | - | |
| 92 | + | |
| 93 | + | |
93 | 94 | | |
94 | 95 | | |
95 | 96 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments