docs(spec): state what the object-* blocks declare on record_picker's filter docblock (#17657)

The `filter` docblock on `ElementRecordPickerPropsSchema` (anchor: `Filter rules
narrowing which records the picker offers`) claimed that "the four `object-*`
blocks declare `filter` as `z.unknown()`, no orthography at all". Measured on
`packages/spec/src/ui/component.zod.ts`: zero occurrences of a `filter` key
declared `z.unknown()`, against 61 occurrences of `z.unknown()` in the same file
on the same instrument. All eight Zod `filter` declarations in the file are
`z.array(ViewFilterRuleSchema).optional()`.

The `object-*` family in `ComponentPropsMap` has six entries, not four. Four of
them carry a `filter` door -- `object-grid`, `object-metric`, `object-kanban`,
`object-calendar` -- and each declares `z.array(ViewFilterRuleSchema)`. The
other two, `object-form` and `object-master-detail-form`, declare no `filter`
key at all. The corrected parenthetical states both numbers, names all six and
keeps the existing provenance citation unchanged.

Prose only: no declaration moves and no accept set changes.


Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01MkQhmuuJAVDjmeWNixwDDH

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

Author: os-bill

.changeset/17475-record-picker-filter-docblock.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+---
+'@objectstack/spec': patch
+---
+
+`element:record_picker`'s `filter` docblock now says what the `object-*` blocks actually declare
+
+The docblock on `ElementRecordPickerPropsSchema.filter` (anchor:
+`Filter rules narrowing which records the picker offers`) carried a
+parenthetical claiming *"the four `object-*` blocks declare `filter` as
+`z.unknown()`, no orthography at all"*. Measured on the file itself: there is no
+`filter` key anywhere in `packages/spec/src/ui/component.zod.ts` declared
+`z.unknown()` — zero occurrences, against 61 occurrences of `z.unknown()` in the
+same file on the same instrument, so the zero is a reading and not a broken
+matcher. All eight Zod `filter` declarations in the file are
+`z.array(ViewFilterRuleSchema).optional()`; the one remaining `filter:` line is a
+`KeySetGuidance` prose entry, not a declaration.
+
+The `object-*` family in `ComponentPropsMap` has **six** entries. **Four** of
+them carry a `filter` door — `object-grid`, `object-metric`, `object-kanban`,
+`object-calendar` — and all four declare `z.array(ViewFilterRuleSchema)`. The
+other two, `object-form` and `object-master-detail-form`, declare no `filter`
+key at all. The corrected parenthetical states both numbers and names all six,
+and keeps the `#15449` citation, which is accurate as provenance for when those
+four doors moved onto the array form.
+
+**Why this is worth a patch rather than a silent tidy.** The sentence sat in the
+one docblock that tells an author what the sibling `filter` doors accept, and it
+told them those doors accept anything. The record form it thereby invited —
+`{ field: { $eq: ... } }`, the MongoDB-style shape this very docblock says the
+picker moved OFF — is refused at parse by all four. Prose only: no declaration
+moves and no accept set changes.

packages/spec/src/ui/component.zod.ts

@@ -2200,8 +2200,12 @@ export const ElementRecordPickerPropsSchema = lazySchema(() => strictObject({
    * `ViewFilterRule` ARRAY form, `[{ field, operator, value }, ...]`, the one
    * filter orthography the map's array-declared `filter` doors share
    * (`record:related_list`, its nested Add-affordance picker, and — since
-   * #12039 Key 2 — `element:number`; the four `object-*` blocks declare
-   * `filter` as `z.unknown()`, no orthography at all — #15449). Until #14406
+   * #12039 Key 2 — `element:number`; and, since #15449, the four `filter`
+   * doors of the six-entry `object-*` family — `object-grid`,
+   * `object-metric`, `object-kanban` and `object-calendar` — each of which
+   * declares this same `z.array(ViewFilterRuleSchema)`, while that family's
+   * remaining two entries, `object-form` and `object-master-detail-form`,
+   * declare no `filter` key at all). Until #14406
    * this entry alone still said `FilterConditionSchema`, the MongoDB-style
    * record form: the last record-form `filter` in `ComponentPropsMap` after
    * the ui#6206 ruling (2026-08-25, Option B, verbatim 「同意」: one filter