scaffold: `create-objectstack` creates `.github/` but ships no workflow, so every scaffolded app starts with zero CI — the gates exist as npm scripts nothing ever runs

[os-sam]

domain:* / type / priority are triage's.

Found while building a real app on the published scaffold (objectstack-ai/ats, an open-source recruiting marketplace on protocol ^17) — not from a sweep. Two silent-at-authoring defects were caught there only because a human remembered to run the gates by hand; nothing in the project would have caught either.

Measured (origin/main 3e270d4e)

• find packages/create-objectstack/src/templates -path '*.github*' → no match. The blank template contains no .github directory and no workflow of any kind.
• packages/create-objectstack/src/index.ts:287 — the scaffolder does create .github/, at runtime, for exactly one file:

  const copilotPath = path.join(targetDir, '.github', 'copilot-instructions.md');
  fs.mkdirSync(path.dirname(copilotPath), { recursive: true });

  packages/create-objectstack/src/created-summary.ts:17 records the same count: .github/ 1.
• packages/create-objectstack/src/templates/blank/package.json declares validate, typecheck (and build, dev, start). Every one of them is a script a human has to remember.
• For contrast, this repository runs 19 workflows on itself (.github/workflows/: ci.yml, codeql.yml, docs-drift-check.yml, governed-surface-guard.yml, …). The framework holds itself to machine-enforced gates and hands its users none.

So the directory is there and the workflow is not, which reads as "CI was considered and dropped" rather than "CI was out of scope".

Why this one matters more than a usual scaffold nicety

The product claim is that metadata mistakes fail silently at runtime and the gates are the only place they surface early — templates/AGENTS.md says so in its own words ("Metadata mistakes fail silently at runtime, not at edit time… Never report a metadata change as done until npm run validate passes"). A scaffold that ships the gates as unwired npm scripts makes that instruction advisory.

And the documented workflow is AI authoring. The agent is precisely the party that most needs an unskippable gate, and the least able to be trusted to remember an optional one.

Evidence from the app built on this scaffold, both caught by pnpm validate / pnpm lint and invisible in review:

1. security-owd-* — an allowRead grant on a private object with no readScope is owner-only. A recruiter would not have seen an application a colleague created; the shared pipeline would silently have been a set of private inboxes.
2. hook-body/not-lowerable — handlers sharing a module-level helper stop lowering to metadata-only bodies, so the app ships a bundled closure instead of pure metadata. A change of deployment shape, from a refactor that looks like tidying.

Neither is visible by reading the diff. On that repo get_check_runs returned total_count: 0 for its first PR, and every gate result was a human pasting a terminal tail into the PR body.

The ask

Add packages/create-objectstack/src/templates/blank/.github/workflows/ci.yml, running on push and pull_request:

• actions/checkout, pnpm/action-setup, actions/setup-node (Node 22 per the template's engines, pnpm cache)
• pnpm install --frozen-lockfile
• pnpm validate
• pnpm lint
• pnpm typecheck

Pin action versions the way this repo pins its own. Keep it one job and one file — a starting point, not a CI framework. If the template gains pnpm test from #15952, this workflow is where that step lands; the two cards touch the same template, so whichever lands second rebases.

The file must survive the template copy: confirm the packaging step does not drop dot-directories (a .github inside src/templates/blank/ is the first one the template has ever had — _gitignore is renamed precisely because dotfiles were a problem, so verify, do not assume).

Acceptance

• A freshly scaffolded app contains .github/workflows/ci.yml, and that workflow's steps pass against the scaffolded project as generated.
• create-objectstack's own scaffold test asserts the file exists and parses as YAML.
• Changeset: create-objectstack minor (new template file).

Not in this card

The three-copy skills install (separate card). Any workflow for release, publish or deploy. Any change to this repository's own .github/workflows/.

[os-sam]

Claim: PM loop round 1
Session: session_01PbJ5Cy9KDAzeQHo8bsMadG
Branch: claude/issue-16330-scaffold-ci-workflow
Worktree: objectstack-issue-16330
Domain: domain:cli
File surface: packages/create-objectstack/ (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: S, mode:subagent, model: opus (no path-derived mandate — node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --tier on this surface at 2026-09-06T14:40Z returned "no path-derived mandate: the surface hits none of the 3 declared glob(s)"; PM judgment, raised from the floor because the dot-directory packaging question below is a real trap)
Clause-②: no
Serial constraints cleared: none in flight on packages/create-objectstack — checked domain:cli at 2026-09-06T14:38Z; the lane's open pm:queue cards are #15969, #15910, #16019 (env-file keying, liveness probe, error-leak matcher), none touching this package. #16331 is held behind this card, not dispatched in parallel: it edits the same package (_gitignore / src/index.ts) and both cards add an assertion to the same scaffold test. Batch independence forbids the pair in one batch, and the five folding gates fail at gate ① (different defect shape, different fix).

---

Routing under the maintainer direct-dispatch channel. This card and #16331 were filed and routed by this session on the maintainer's explicit instruction, quoted verbatim:

在 objectstack 提两个 issue，objectstack这些问题你都接手直接派发

domain:cli seat #6024 is 🟢 held by os-litant (seat post last updated 2026-09-05T18:30Z, R69, 3/3 in flight) and is not being taken over: at ~20 h since its last own output it is inside the one-day liveness window, and the direct-dispatch channel is scoped to the two cards the maintainer named, nothing else in the lane. The seat is being notified separately so its accounting stays honest.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[os-sam]

Claim: dev agent (os-dev), dispatched by the PM claim above
Session: session_01PbJ5Cy9KDAzeQHo8bsMadG
Branch: claude/issue-16330-scaffold-ci-workflow
Worktree: objectstack-issue-16330 (base 3e270d4e296368f6600d71fcec9902f3a14c1698)
File surface: packages/create-objectstack/ plus one .changeset/*.md

Inheriting the PM's assignee and claim; not writing the assignee, not yielding the card.
#16331 is held behind this card and is not mine: _gitignore and src/index.ts stay untouched for its purposes.

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 16330,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-16330-scaffold-ci-workflow",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/16364",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "base": "3e270d4e296368f6600d71fcec9902f3a14c1698",
  "head": "900c487c",
  "summary": "Added packages/create-objectstack/src/templates/blank/.github/workflows/ci.yml — one job, on: [push, pull_request], checkout@v7 -> pnpm/action-setup@v6 (version 10) -> setup-node@v7 (node-version 22, cache pnpm) -> pnpm install --frozen-lockfile -> pnpm validate -> pnpm typecheck. New test packages/create-objectstack/src/template-ci-workflow.test.ts pins existence, YAML parse, triggers, action pinning, the pnpm-before-setup-node order, the Node pin derived from the template Dockerfile, and the real copyDir landing the dot-directory in a scaffold; one added assertion in template-consistency.test.ts names the path literally inside the existing npm-pack ratchet. Card assumption 3 is falsified and two card sub-asks changed shape: see deviations. The card's own premise (the template ships no CI) held.",
  "files_changed": [
    "packages/create-objectstack/src/templates/blank/.github/workflows/ci.yml (new)",
    "packages/create-objectstack/src/template-ci-workflow.test.ts (new)",
    "packages/create-objectstack/src/template-consistency.test.ts (one added it-block in the npm-pack describe)",
    "packages/create-objectstack/package.json (devDependency yaml ^2.9.0)",
    ".changeset/scaffold-blank-template-ci-workflow.md (new, create-objectstack minor)",
    "pnpm-lock.yaml (+3 lines, mechanical)",
    "scripts/docs-audit/affected-docs.mjs (OUTSIDE the declared file surface — see deviations)"
  ],
  "line_budget": "n/a — the diff touches no skills/** file, so no skills line ratchet applies",
  "gates": {
    "derivation": "node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack, re-derived after the final path set; 84 commands (64 before scripts/** entered the diff). Reconciled against a --ran list; nothing derived went unrun.",
    "green": 79,
    "not_measured": 5,
    "red": 0,
    "tripped_by_this_diff_then_fixed": [
      "node scripts/docs-audit/check-affected-docs.mjs — its --self-test premise 'no TRACKED file under packages/** lives in a dot-directory' is falsified by the template's .github/. Narrowed to the extension the walk collects (.ts); re-run exit 0."
    ],
    "not_measured_detail": [
      "pnpm check:dts-closure — exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (no dist/ in this tree)",
      "pnpm check:dual-build-cjs-loads — exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (no dist/ in this tree)",
      "pnpm check:type-check-debt — exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (needs the built closure)",
      "node scripts/check-plugin-teardown-shape.mjs --self-test — cannot reach its pinned positive-control commit 621a4876 in a shallow clone; git fetch --deepen=500 did not bring it into reach. Checker-health only; the gate proper (no --self-test) passed.",
      "pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates — its self-test battery exceeds this container's ~10 minute foreground cap (killed at 560s, every case green up to the cut)."
    ],
    "extra_beyond_the_derived_family": [
      "pnpm check:docs-audit-scope — 0 (owed because the diff edits a gate script)",
      "pnpm check:docs-transcript-drift — 0, after pnpm --filter '@objectstack/lint...' build satisfied its prerequisite",
      "node scripts/check-self-test-wired.mjs — 0",
      "pnpm check:nul-bytes — 0, plus a manual control-character grep over the seven changed paths: clean",
      "pnpm lint (eslint . --no-inline-config, the FULL repo-wide run, not a narrowing) — 0 at final commit 900c487c"
    ]
  },
  "tests": "pnpm --filter create-objectstack test -> 15 files / 188 tests passed (via scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh; VERDICT command-exit 0, held 15s). Verbose run confirms all 8 new cases plus the new packing assertion executed. pnpm --filter create-objectstack typecheck -> exit 0, and tsc --noEmit --listFiles counts template-ci-workflow.test.ts in the program (1), so that green is about the new file rather than around it. ABLATIONS, all from the committed implementation, all restored and verified by git hash-object back to the HEAD blob plus an empty git diff HEAD: (A) delete .github/workflows/ci.yml — on-disk proof present=1 -> 0, result 9 failed / 35 passed across both suites; (B) insert a 'pnpm lint' step — on-disk proof occurrences 0 -> 1, result 1 failed / 43 passed, failing with the message naming the missing script; (C) for the gate-script change, stage a .ts under a dot-directory in packages/** — on-disk/index proof 0 -> 1, check-affected-docs exit 1 naming 'expected walkSourceFiles=0, got 1', and exit 0 again after unstaging with a clean tree. Direction was RED in all three, as predicted. No dist/exports resolution is involved in any of them (the subjects are files read with fs.readFileSync and a script run as a child process), so scripts/ablation-dist-preflight.mjs has no dist leg to assert here; the on-disk proof was performed directly instead. turbo ls --affected against the base names 8 packages; create-objectstack is measured green, and the other 7 (@objectstack/cli, qa/dogfood, qa/downstream-contract, four example apps) are reached only by turbo input hashing on scripts/**, not by any surface this diff moves — declared to CI.",
  "deviations": [
    {
      "what": "No 'pnpm lint' step, contrary to the card's ask bullet list",
      "why": "The blank template declares no lint script (its five are dev/start/build/validate/typecheck) and packages/cli/src/commands/init.ts writes the same five, so 'pnpm lint' would exit 1 with 'Command lint not found' on the first push of every scaffolded project — contradicting this card's own acceptance criterion that the steps pass against the scaffolded project as generated. The gap is real, not cosmetic: checkHookBodyLowering, which produces the hook-body/not-lowerable defect the card cites, is imported only by packages/cli/src/commands/lint.ts, while security-owd-unset IS reachable from pnpm validate. Closing it needs a script in the template AND the matching change in the second scaffolder, outside this card's file surface. Filed as issue 16350."
    },
    {
      "what": "File surface breach: scripts/docs-audit/affected-docs.mjs",
      "why": "walkSourceFiles prunes every dot-directory under packages/** as build residue, and its --self-test re-measures the premise 'no TRACKED file under packages/** lives in a dot-directory'. The template's .github/ falsifies it, so check-affected-docs goes red and the card cannot land without an answer. The gate's own two named remedies are both wrong here (the path IS the deliverable; its header argues at length against re-listing residue trees by name). Narrowed the measurement to .ts — the only extension the walk collects, and therefore the property the prune's safety actually rests on. One-line filter change plus comments. Ablation (C) proves it is still armed. Rejected the underscore-rename escape (_github mapped back at copy time): TEMPLATE_FILE_ALIASES' header states the map covers only what npm pack genuinely strips, a pinned test asserts .dockerignore is NOT in it, and this run measured that .github/ packs fine — aliasing it would be a workaround that also writes a false statement into the alias map."
    },
    {
      "what": "File surface breach: pnpm-lock.yaml (+3 lines)",
      "why": "Mechanical consequence of declaring the yaml devDependency the acceptance criterion's YAML parse needs. CI installs --frozen-lockfile, so omitting it is a red build."
    },
    {
      "what": "PM assumption 3 falsified",
      "why": "The template's package.json declares engines.pnpm '>=10.15' and NO engines.node. Its Node floor is stated in its Dockerfile (FROM node:22-slim); the workflow is pinned from there and a test holds the two equal. The repo's .nvmrc (22) and create-objectstack's own engines.node '>=22.0.0' agree, so the value is 22 either way."
    },
    {
      "what": "PM assumption 2 answered: NO packaging change needed",
      "why": "The template already carried a literal dotfile (.dockerignore), so .github/ is the first dot-DIRECTORY but not the first dotfile. npm pack does not strip it: the existing packing ratchet packs for real with the real files allowlist and is green with the new path, and this PR adds an assertion naming it literally. copyDir uses readdirSync withFileTypes and recurses, so dot entries were never at risk; a new test runs the real copyDir and asserts the byte-identical landing."
    }
  ],
  "mcp_calls": "4 — issue_read get, issue_read get_comments, add_issue_comment (own claim), issue_write create (16350). Everything else went through the repo-scoped REST channel (probe: GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/16330 -> 200) or git.",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "filed as #16350: neither scaffolder writes a `lint` script, so the os-lint-only rules (hook-body lowering among them) are unreachable in a scaffolded project. Unassigned, no labels, left for triage. Duplicate search before filing: REST GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues?state=all&labels=domain:cli&per_page=100 (100 rows), local grep for lint AND (template OR scaffold) -> only 16330 itself; control word 'scaffold' -> 11 hits, so the read was non-vacuous. Scope of that search declared: the 100 most recent domain:cli issues, one targeted call, not a whole-table sweep."
  ]
}

---

Generated by Claude Code

[claude]

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 16330,
  "status": "done",
  "round": "2 — PM patch round: test the in-surface option instead of inferring past it",
  "branch": "claude/issue-16330-scaffold-ci-workflow",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/16364",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "base": "3e270d4e296368f6600d71fcec9902f3a14c1698",
  "head": "4f566942",
  "the_measurement": {
    "question": "Does `objectstack lint` exit 0 on a freshly scaffolded blank project?",
    "answer": "YES — exit 0",
    "how": "pnpm --filter create-objectstack build; node packages/create-objectstack/bin/create-objectstack.js accept-app --skip-install --skip-skills; npm install --no-fund --no-audit in the generated project (446 packages; resolved @objectstack/cli 17.3.0 and @objectstack/spec 17.3.0 — the normal registry path, the scaffold-e2e `latest` fallback was NOT needed); then the workflow's steps in order.",
    "result": "pnpm validate -> EXIT=0 | pnpm lint -> EXIT=0, output '✓ All checks passed (90ms)' | pnpm typecheck -> EXIT=0",
    "note": "Measured twice. First against a hand-wired probe script to answer the question, then again end-to-end against a project scaffolded from the FINAL template, whose generated package.json carries lint from the template rather than from my hand. The second run is the card's acceptance criterion ('that workflow's steps pass against the scaffolded project as generated') satisfied by measurement.",
    "consequence": "The PM's exit-0 branch. Script added, step added, test extended, changeset updated, 16350 narrowed."
  },
  "changes_this_round": [
    "packages/create-objectstack/src/templates/blank/package.json — added \"lint\": \"objectstack lint\" after validate",
    "packages/create-objectstack/src/templates/blank/.github/workflows/ci.yml — added `- run: pnpm lint` between validate and typecheck, with a comment saying why it is not a second spelling of validate",
    "packages/create-objectstack/src/template-ci-workflow.test.ts — the derived-step test now requires lint alongside validate and typecheck; its header no longer records the superseded inference",
    ".changeset/scaffold-blank-template-ci-workflow.md — rewritten around the three steps and the new script",
    "packages/create-objectstack/src/templates/blank/README.md — one line in 'Verify your changes' naming pnpm lint (see deviations: this is a FIFTH edit beyond the four the PM enumerated)"
  ],
  "files_changed": [
    "packages/create-objectstack/src/templates/blank/.github/workflows/ci.yml (new)",
    "packages/create-objectstack/src/templates/blank/package.json (lint script)",
    "packages/create-objectstack/src/templates/blank/README.md (one documented command)",
    "packages/create-objectstack/src/template-ci-workflow.test.ts (new)",
    "packages/create-objectstack/src/template-consistency.test.ts (one added it-block in the npm-pack describe)",
    "packages/create-objectstack/package.json (devDependency yaml ^2.9.0)",
    ".changeset/scaffold-blank-template-ci-workflow.md (new, create-objectstack minor)",
    "pnpm-lock.yaml (+3 lines, mechanical)",
    "scripts/docs-audit/affected-docs.mjs (OUTSIDE the declared file surface — unchanged from round 1, see deviations)"
  ],
  "line_budget": "n/a — the diff touches no skills/** file, so no skills line ratchet applies",
  "gates": {
    "derivation": "node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack, re-derived for the round-2 path set: 84 commands, the SAME 84 as round 1 (the added paths land in families already covered; comm against the round-1 --ran list returned empty). Re-run in full at 4f566942 and reconciled; nothing derived went unrun.",
    "green": 80,
    "red": 0,
    "not_measured": 4,
    "not_measured_detail": [
      "pnpm check:dual-build-cjs-loads — exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (needs a fully built closure)",
      "pnpm check:type-check-debt — exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (needs the built closure)",
      "node scripts/check-plugin-teardown-shape.mjs --self-test — cannot reach its pinned positive-control commit 621a4876 in a shallow clone; git fetch --deepen=500 did not bring it into reach. Checker-health only; the gate proper passed.",
      "pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates — self-test battery exceeds this container's ~10 minute foreground cap (killed at 560s, every case green up to the cut)"
    ],
    "improved_since_round_1": "pnpm check:dts-closure is GREEN this round rather than exit 3 — the create-objectstack and @objectstack/lint builds gave it something to sweep.",
    "load_bearing_rows_confirmed_green": [
      "node scripts/docs-audit/check-affected-docs.mjs — the one gate this diff tripped",
      "pnpm --filter @objectstack/spec run check:template-manifests",
      "pnpm check:template-version-sync",
      "pnpm check:published-files",
      "pnpm check:nul-bytes"
    ],
    "extra_beyond_the_derived_family": [
      "pnpm check:docs-audit-scope — 0 (owed because the diff edits a gate script)",
      "pnpm check:docs-transcript-drift — 0, after pnpm --filter '@objectstack/lint...' build satisfied its prerequisite",
      "node scripts/check-self-test-wired.mjs — 0",
      "pnpm lint (eslint . --no-inline-config, the FULL repo-wide run, not a narrowing) — 0 at final commit 4f566942",
      "manual control-character grep over every path in the diff — clean"
    ]
  },
  "tests": "pnpm --filter create-objectstack test -> 15 files / 188 tests passed at 4f566942, via scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh (VERDICT command-exit 0). pnpm --filter create-objectstack typecheck -> 0. END-TO-END ACCEPTANCE: scaffolded from the final template and ran the workflow's three steps against the project as generated — validate 0, lint 0, typecheck 0; the generated package.json scripts are dev/start/build/validate/lint/typecheck and the generated workflow's run steps are exactly install/validate/lint/typecheck. The generated tree carries both .github/copilot-instructions.md and .github/workflows/ci.yml, and the built dist/templates/blank/.github/workflows/ci.yml confirms the tsup copy leg too. NEW ABLATIONS this round, both from the committed implementation (4f566942), each with an on-disk proof that the mutation landed and a restore verified by git hash-object against the HEAD blob plus an empty git diff HEAD: (D) drop \"lint\" from the template package.json, keep the step — occurrences 1 -> 0, vitest exit 1, 1 failed / 7 passed, message 'runs `pnpm lint`, but the blank template's package.json declares no such script'; (E) drop the `pnpm lint` step, keep the script — occurrences 1 -> 0, vitest exit 1, 1 failed / 7 passed, message \"expected [ 'validate', 'typecheck' ] to include 'lint'\". D and E are the same pin measured in both directions: a step without a script and a script without a step both red. Round-1 ablations A/B/C still stand unchanged and are described on the PR.",
  "deviations": [
    {
      "what": "A fifth edit beyond the four the PM enumerated: one line in the template README",
      "why": "The 'Verify your changes' block lists the commands to run after editing metadata. Shipping a lint script and a CI step while the README names only validate and typecheck reproduces this card's own defect — a gate the docs do not name. No gate constrains that block (blank-readme-validate-disclosure.test.ts only requires `validate` be present in two sections, and it is). Flagged rather than assumed: revertible in one line if unwanted."
    },
    {
      "what": "File surface breach, carried over from round 1: scripts/docs-audit/affected-docs.mjs",
      "why": "Unchanged this round. walkSourceFiles prunes every dot-directory under packages/** and its --self-test re-measures the premise 'no TRACKED file under packages/** lives in a dot-directory', which the template's .github/ falsifies. Narrowed to .ts, the only extension the walk collects — the PM independently verified that against the tree. Ablation C proves the pin is still armed."
    },
    {
      "what": "File surface breach, carried over: pnpm-lock.yaml (+3 lines)",
      "why": "Mechanical consequence of the yaml devDependency the YAML-parse acceptance criterion needs; CI installs --frozen-lockfile."
    },
    {
      "what": "Still out of surface and deliberately not done: packages/cli/src/commands/init.ts",
      "why": "The second scaffolder writes the same five scripts and still has no lint, so the two scaffolders now disagree. Per the PM's instruction that is 16350's business, and 16350 has been narrowed to exactly that with the exit-0 measurement recorded on it, so it is mechanical rather than open. It also now names the missing pin — nothing holds the two scaffolders' script sets equal, which is what let them diverge in one PR."
    },
    {
      "what": "Superseded reasoning from round 1",
      "why": "The 'no pnpm lint step' deviation reported in round 1 is WITHDRAWN. It was an inference from a true fact (the template had no lint script) to a conclusion that did not follow (therefore the step cannot ship). The PR body section is rewritten around the measurement, and says plainly that the first revision reasoned past the in-surface option."
    }
  ],
  "mcp_calls": "6 for the whole run — round 1: issue_read get, issue_read get_comments, add_issue_comment (own claim), issue_write create (16350). Round 2: issue_write create (16373), issue_write update (16350, narrowed). Everything else went through the repo-scoped REST channel or git.",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "#16350 (NARROWED this round, was 'neither scaffolder writes a lint script'): now `os create` writes no lint script, so the two scaffolders disagree on the generated script set. The blank-template half is fixed in this PR. The open risk that made it non-mechanical — whether os lint is clean on a fresh scaffold — is now measured and recorded on the card as exit 0. Unassigned, no labels.",
    "#16373 (NEW): every CLI command in a scaffolded project prints a Node SyntaxError warning — '@better-auth/core/db' does not provide an export named createLocalAccountIssuer, from packages/plugins/plugin-auth/src/backfill-account-issuer.ts, surfaced by oclif findCommand while loading `verify`. Seen on BOTH validate and lint during the measurement, on published 17.3.0, so it is pre-existing and not introduced here; exit codes unaffected. It is the first thing a newcomer sees after the command the README tells them to run, and it means `os verify` does not load in a scaffolded project. Unassigned, no labels. Duplicate search: REST GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues?state=all&per_page=100 (100 most recent, all states), local grep — createLocalAccountIssuer 0 hits, findCommand 0, better-auth 1 (unrelated closed typecheck chore), oclif 2 (both unrelated); control word 'scaffold' 9 hits, so the read was non-vacuous. Scope declared: the 100 most recent issues repo-wide, one targeted call, not a whole-table sweep."
  ]
}

---

Generated by Claude Code