Enhancement: Possiblility to select a robot in Bundles

[saarnold]

I think this would mainly affect the config directory and the transformations that should be loaded in the bundle initialization. Does something speak against implementing a support for robot sub directories in bundles?

[doudou]

Depends on how it is done. I would be OK with having an equivalent of the (new !) Syskit mechanism for the script-oriented bundle support for instance. Which means having a config file in config/robots for the bundle system to load. That file does all the setup needed (nothing implicit anymore)

[saarnold]

How would this config file look like? I assume this would then also be used in the Robot.config block in the config/robots/robot_name.rb. Or should bundles load directly the robot_name.rb?

[doudou]

.That is ... a very good question.

I would definitely prefer having two files, one for syskit, one for orocos.rb / bundles. Otherwise, one could easily add some syskit-specific stuff and break the orocos.rb/bundles things (and vice-versa)

However, naming-wise, I wonder what would be best ..