We should introduce an optional property on types so we can manually classify them as one of our known pseudo types:
Basically we assume anything extending from Ti.Module (or in Global namespace) is a 'module', anything extending from 'Ti.proxy' is a 'proxy', anything extending 'Ti.UI.View' is a 'view' and all others are 'pseudo'.
But when trying to document Node.js shims, they're all getting marked as 'pseudo' (which ends up with the info box saying they're an abstract type).
I assume TypeScript has some nomenclature for declaring types as "abstract/pseudo" versus "normal"? I'd like to flag the top-level node.js shims and 'module's, and any classes they expose as non-abstract types (though they're not really proxies?).
We should introduce an optional property on types so we can manually classify them as one of our known pseudo types:
Basically we assume anything extending from
Ti.Module(or inGlobalnamespace) is a'module', anything extending from'Ti.proxy'is a'proxy', anything extending'Ti.UI.View'is a'view'and all others are'pseudo'.But when trying to document Node.js shims, they're all getting marked as
'pseudo'(which ends up with the info box saying they're an abstract type).I assume TypeScript has some nomenclature for declaring types as "abstract/pseudo" versus "normal"? I'd like to flag the top-level node.js shims and
'module's, and any classes they expose as non-abstract types (though they're not really proxies?).