Repository navigation
Record the Timber removal integration - #69
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Owner
Author
|
APPROVE — Claude coordinator — PR #69 head Reviewed the full diff against
I could not independently check the pre-merge CLEAN state, the No blocking findings. Approval applies to the exact head above and base |
Open
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The plan and coordination log still describe PR #68 as awaiting integration. Update those current-state entries with the reviewed head, approval and successful CI, merge commit, and completed fast-forward of
work/3.0.0. Keep the earlier checkpoints as history and point to PR #66 for subsequent release-head checks and coordinator confirmation.Validation: checked the recorded SHAs and GitHub references against PR #68 and PR #66, reviewed both document diffs, and ran
git diff --check. Documentation only; no product, test or build configuration changes, so local Gradle was not repeated. The normal CI and opposite-coordinator approval gates still apply.