Skip to content

pytorch-xdit:v26.9 MAD integration - #59

Merged
nsakkine merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
feature/pytorch-xdit-v269-mad-integration
Sep 18, 2026
Merged

nsakkine merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
feature/pytorch-xdit-v269-mad-integration

Conversation

@nsakkine

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updates ROCm/MAD capability to cover pytorch-xdit:v26.9 release

Goals

Enable pytorch-xdit:v26.9 runs through Model Automation and Dashboarding (ROCm/MAD)

Tasks

Complete

  • Update README with LTX-2.5 and Minimax-H3 instructions
  • Replace LTX-2.3 with -2.5 in models.json
  • Bump-up base image in MAD Dockerfile
  • Reformat models.jsonand enable run.sh and Dockerfile access with relative paths

to cover all goals.

Tests

Tested internally during QA process.

Fixed json formatting

Fixed models.json

Fixed script relative path in models.json
@nsakkine
nsakkine marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2026 05:18
@nsakkine
nsakkine requested a review from a team as a code owner September 18, 2026 05:18
@nsakkine
nsakkine requested a review from lauri9 September 18, 2026 05:18

@lauri9 lauri9 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new workload definitions look okay!

I'm not following why the change to the scripts and dockerfile paths, but if this has been tested already should be fine as well.

"name": "pyt_xdit_flux",
"dockerfile": "docker/pyt_xdit",
"scripts": "scripts/pyt_xdit/run.sh",
"dockerfile": "../../docker/pyt_xdit",

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see that the paths for dockerfile and scripts have changed throughout. Is the relative path for dockerfile relative to the location of this file, integrations/MAD/MAD/? If so, would ../.. not point one level too high, at ./integrations/ instead of the root of the repository?

@nsakkine nsakkine Sep 18, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some confusions exists with our structure, true. The point is that the new relative paths align with the new MAD repository directory structure. They have been tested during the QA process. integrations/MAD/MAD contents is nowadays purely copy to a MAD repository. I have now updated integrations/MAD/README.md accordingly

@nsakkine
nsakkine requested a review from lauri9 September 18, 2026 06:04

@lauri9 lauri9 left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, this is now clear

@nsakkine
nsakkine merged commit 2497623 into main Sep 18, 2026
6 checks passed
@nsakkine
nsakkine deleted the feature/pytorch-xdit-v269-mad-integration branch September 18, 2026 06:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants