Repository navigation
TSLANG_ISSUES: 5, 6 and 19 name their PRs - #579
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Items 5, 6 and 19 still said "this PR"; they now name #576, #575 and #577, in the status table and in their sections. The section holding the fixes after pre-alpha97 is no longer headed "Open": all 19 issues are fixed on main.
Checked on a Release build of main: the repros of 1-4, 8, 9-12 and 13-18 give the expected output (or the expected error for 2 and 17), and the regression tests for 5, 6 and 19 (
00cpp_overloads,00c_string_copy, thecppvtabletests) pass.🤖 Generated with Claude Code