AxiomGuard 0.5.1: release hardening and integration qualification - #11
Open
imedkablavi wants to merge 23 commits into
Open
AxiomGuard 0.5.1: release hardening and integration qualification#11imedkablavi wants to merge 23 commits into
imedkablavi wants to merge 23 commits into
Conversation
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Scope
Release-readiness/security hardening pass for AxiomGuard after the prepared 0.5.0 line.
Security fixes
Release/QA
.tgzinstall/import/CLI/type declaration qualificationCompatibility
No intended breaking TypeScript API removals. New GitHub delivery replay helper is additive. The in-memory stores now have bounded capacity (default 10,000) and may evict oldest live entries under sustained high-cardinality pressure; distributed/high-volume deployments should use Redis.
Known boundary
safeFetchstill cannot pin a prevalidated DNS answer to the socket used by the underlying Fetch transport. The threat model continues to require network egress controls for high-risk SSRF workloads.CI must be green before merge.