Skip to content

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

4 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

BioNanomics Research Proposal

Project TouchCell

Human-in-the-Loop Haptic Micromanipulation Platform

Master's Thesis Proposal

Disciplines

  • Mechanical Engineering (Mechatronics)
  • Computer Science / Robotics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Executive Summary

Develop an open, modular platform that allows scientists to manipulate microscopic objects using commercial haptic devices while receiving real-time force and virtual haptic feedback.

The project will investigate whether haptic interfaces, computer vision, AI-assisted guidance, and precision micromanipulators can improve the speed, precision, and safety of biological manipulation tasks.

Rather than building a robot that replaces scientists, this project focuses on creating an intelligent instrument that amplifies human skill.

The resulting platform should become the foundation for future BioNanomics research in:

  • Single-cell manipulation
  • Patch-clamp electrophysiology
  • Embryo microinjection
  • Organoid manipulation
  • Laser capture microdissection
  • Optical tweezers
  • AI-assisted microscopy
  • Tele-operated laboratory robotics

Research Objectives

  • Design an extensible hardware architecture for haptic micromanipulation.
  • Develop an open software platform that integrates commercial laboratory hardware.
  • Investigate bilateral haptic feedback at microscopic scales.
  • Evaluate synthetic (vision-derived) versus physical force feedback.
  • Develop AI-assisted "shared autonomy" that guides rather than replaces the operator.
  • Publish all software, interfaces, datasets, and benchmark results.

Primary Research Questions

  • Does haptic feedback improve microscopic manipulation accuracy?
  • Can computer vision generate useful virtual force fields before physical contact occurs?
  • What level of motion scaling produces the best operator performance?
  • Can AI reduce accidental collisions while maintaining complete human control?
  • Which commercial hardware platforms provide the best foundation for future BioNanomics research?

Phase 0 – Literature Review

Objectives

  • Survey bilateral teleoperation
  • Survey haptic rendering
  • Survey virtual fixtures
  • Survey robotic microinjection
  • Survey patch-clamp robotics
  • Survey force sensing
  • Survey optical tweezers
  • Survey shared autonomy
  • Survey surgical robotics

Deliverable

  • Publish a comprehensive literature review suitable for journal submission.

References

  • Okamura, A. M. "Haptic Feedback in Robot-Assisted Surgery."
  • Frontiers in Robotics and AI – Haptic Interfaces for Micromanipulation.
  • IEEE Transactions on Haptics.
  • IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

Phase 1 – Digital Twin

Goal

Build a complete simulation before purchasing laboratory hardware.

System Architecture

Haply Device
↓
Motion Scaling
↓
Virtual Micromanipulator
↓
Virtual Cell
↓
Virtual Force Model
↓
Haptic Feedback

Evaluate

Deliverables

  • Digital twin
  • Force model
  • Motion scaling model
  • Collision detection
  • Virtual fixtures

Phase 2 – Fail Fast Prototype

Estimated Budget

$3,000–5,000

Evaluate for Purchase

  • Haply Inverse3 Haptic Device

  • OpenFlexure Microscope

  • USB3 Machine Vision Camera

    • Basler
    • FLIR
    • Allied Vision
  • 3D Printer

    • Bambu Lab X1 Carbon
    • Prusa MK4S
  • Assorted Linear Rails and Fixtures

    • Misumi
    • OpenBuilds

Success Criteria

  • Demonstrate intuitive manipulation of a virtual pipette over microscope imagery.
  • Validate operator ergonomics.
  • Measure latency.
  • Evaluate motion scaling.

Phase 3 – Precision Motion Platform

Estimated Budget

$10,000–20,000

Evaluate for Purchase

Research Topics

  • Motion scaling
  • Tremor suppression
  • Clutch operation
  • Velocity scaling
  • Coordinate transforms
  • Workspace calibration

Phase 4 – Commercial Micromanipulators

Estimated Budget

$20,000–60,000

Evaluate for Purchase

Evaluation Criteria

  • API quality
  • SDK availability
  • Position repeatability
  • Latency
  • Closed-loop control
  • Community adoption
  • Maintainability
  • Upgrade path

Phase 5 – Haptic Rendering

Initial Approach

No physical force sensor required.

Investigate synthetic force generation using:

  • Image segmentation
  • Collision prediction
  • Motor current
  • Position error
  • Velocity
  • Acceleration
  • Pipette pressure
  • AI-based contact estimation

Develop virtual fixtures representing:

  • Cell membrane
  • Coverslip
  • Pipette
  • Nucleus
  • Organelles
  • Forbidden workspaces

Phase 6 – Force Measurement

Estimated Budget

$20,000–80,000

Evaluate

  • ATI Industrial Automation Force/Torque Sensors

  • MEMS Force Sensors

  • Strain Gauge Designs

  • Piezoelectric Sensors

  • Capacitive Sensors

  • Vision-Based Force Estimation

Compare

  • Physical force sensing
  • Vision-derived force estimation
  • Synthetic force models

Phase 7 – AI Shared Autonomy

Objectives

Integrate AI as a cooperative assistant.

Evaluate

  • Meta Segment Anything (SAM)
  • FoundationPose
  • NVIDIA Foundation Vision Models
  • OpenCV
  • ROS2 Perception Stack

Investigate

  • Virtual fixtures
  • Predictive collision avoidance
  • Motion stabilization
  • AI-assisted insertion guidance
  • Learned manipulation policies

Mechanical Engineering Responsibilities

  • Design modular mounting hardware.
  • Design interchangeable end-effectors.
  • Design vibration-isolated microscope interfaces.
  • Perform finite element analysis.
  • Analyze structural stiffness.
  • Analyze resonance frequencies.
  • Design calibration fixtures.
  • Validate repeatability.
  • Develop manufacturable CAD models.

Software Engineering Responsibilities

  • Develop ROS2 drivers.
  • Develop Haply interface.
  • Develop manipulator interfaces.
  • Develop microscope interfaces.
  • Develop calibration software.
  • Develop haptic rendering engine.
  • Develop data logging.
  • Develop replay system.
  • Develop benchmarking framework.
  • Develop SDK and API.
  • Publish open documentation.

Success Metrics

Measure

  • Position accuracy
  • Insertion success rate
  • Completion time
  • Operator fatigue
  • Learning curve
  • Collision frequency
  • Tissue damage
  • Repeatability
  • Latency
  • User preference
  • Expert versus novice performance

Estimated Multi-Year Budget

Phase Estimated Cost
Simulation $2,000
Early Prototype $5,000
Precision Motion Platform $15,000
Commercial Micromanipulators $50,000
Force Sensing $40,000
AI and Vision Infrastructure $15,000
Mechanical Fabrication and Tooling $20,000
Contingency $25,000
Total Program Estimate Approximately $170,000

Long-Term Vision

The long-term objective is to establish the BioNanomics Haptic Instrumentation Platform (BHIP)—an open, modular ecosystem for precision biological manipulation. BHIP will define standardized interfaces between haptic devices, microscopes, micromanipulators, force sensors, pressure controllers, imaging systems, and AI software. By emphasizing interoperability and reusable software rather than application-specific hardware, the platform will enable future research across patch-clamp electrophysiology, embryo microinjection, organoid surgery, laser capture microdissection, optical tweezers, and AI-assisted laboratory automation, positioning BioNanomics as a leader in next-generation human-in-the-loop scientific instrumentation.

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors