Skip to content

chore(deps): remove GHSA-v2hh-gcrm-f6hx from osv-scanner.toml - #9450

Open
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
osv-scanner-prune/fast-uri-3.1.5
Open

chore(deps): remove GHSA-v2hh-gcrm-f6hx from osv-scanner.toml#9450
github-actions[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
osv-scanner-prune/fast-uri-3.1.5

Conversation

@github-actions

@github-actions github-actions Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • Removed fast-uri GHSA-v2hh-gcrm-f6hx exclusion from osv-scanner.toml
  • fast-uri was upgraded to 3.1.5, which includes the fix (vulnerability was fixed in 3.1.4)
GHSA ID Package Old → New Version Advisory Resolved
GHSA-v2hh-gcrm-f6hx fast-uri 3.1.3 → 3.1.5 CVE-2026-16221 (host confusion via literal backslash authority)

Verification Results

OSV Scanner (HIGH/CRITICAL only)

✅ Passes - fast-uri vulnerability no longer appears in scan results

Dependency Consistency Check

✅ Passes - yarn check-deps completed successfully

Still Blocked

All other exclusions in osv-scanner.toml remain valid due to:

  • tar exclusions (9 CVEs): Constrained by swarm-js requiring tar <7.x while fixes are in tar 7.5.x+ versions
  • minimatch exclusions (3 ReDoS CVEs): Fixes in minimatch 10.x+ break lerna v9 API compatibility
  • sjcl exclusion (GHSA-2w8x-224x-785m): No upstream fix exists (first_patched_version: null)
  • ws exclusion (GHSA-96hv-2xvq-fx4p): We use ws exclusively as WebSocket CLIENT, vulnerability affects server usage
  • form-data, protobufjs, tmp exclusions: Risk mitigated by controlled usage patterns with trusted inputs only

Test Plan

  • OSV scanner no longer flags fast-uri GHSA-v2hh-gcrm-f6hx
  • yarn check-deps passes (dependency consistency maintained)
  • Lockfile updated to reflect resolution changes
  • All other exclusions remain appropriately justified

🤖 Generated with osv-scanner-prune automation

fast-uri upgraded to 3.1.5, vulnerability fixed in 3.1.4

Ticket: HSM-429
@github-actions github-actions Bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file automated Automated changes security Security-related changes labels Aug 7, 2026
@github-actions
github-actions Bot requested review from a team as code owners August 7, 2026 12:14

@s84krish s84krish left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

flush, ci

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

automated Automated changes dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file security Security-related changes

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants