-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 389
London | 26-ITP-May | Bisrat Tesfay | Sprint 3 | Implement and rewrite #1475
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -14,7 +14,33 @@ test(`should return "Acute angle" when (0 < angle < 90)`, () => { | |
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Case 2: Right angle | ||
| test(`should return "Right angle" when angle is 90`, () => { | ||
| expect(getAngleType(90)).toEqual("Right angle"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Case 3: Obtuse angles | ||
| test(`should return "Obtuse angle" when (90 < angle < 180)`, () => { | ||
| expect(getAngleType(91)).toEqual("Obtuse angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(120)).toEqual("Obtuse angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(179)).toEqual("Obtuse angle"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Case 4: Straight angle | ||
| test(`should return "Straight angle" when angle is 180`, () => { | ||
| expect(getAngleType(180)).toEqual("Straight angle"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Case 5: Reflex angles | ||
| test(`should return "Reflex angle" when (180 < angle < 360)`, () => { | ||
| expect(getAngleType(181)).toEqual("Reflex angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(270)).toEqual("Reflex angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(359)).toEqual("Reflex angle"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Case 6: Invalid angles | ||
| test(`should return "Invalid angle" for invalid angles`, () => { | ||
| expect(getAngleType(0)).toEqual("Invalid angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(-10)).toEqual("Invalid angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(360)).toEqual("Invalid angle"); | ||
| expect(getAngleType(400)).toEqual("Invalid angle"); | ||
|
Comment on lines
+23
to
+45
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Well done. Good choices for the boundary cases |
||
| }); | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -9,6 +9,28 @@ test(`Should return 11 when given an ace card`, () => { | |
| expect(getCardValue("A♠")).toEqual(11); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Case 2: Number cards (2–10) | ||
| test("should return the correct value for number cards", () => { | ||
| expect(getCardValue("2♥")).toEqual(2); | ||
| expect(getCardValue("5♦")).toEqual(5); | ||
| expect(getCardValue("10♣")).toEqual(10); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Case 3: Face cards (J, Q, K) | ||
| test("should return 10 for face cards", () => { | ||
| expect(getCardValue("J♠")).toEqual(10); | ||
| expect(getCardValue("Q♥")).toEqual(10); | ||
| expect(getCardValue("K♦")).toEqual(10); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // Case 4: Invalid cards | ||
| test("should throw an error for invalid cards", () => { | ||
| expect(() => getCardValue("1♠")).toThrow(); | ||
| expect(() => getCardValue("11♣")).toThrow(); | ||
| expect(() => getCardValue("Z♥")).toThrow(); | ||
| expect(() => getCardValue("0♠")).toThrow(); | ||
| expect(() => getCardValue("invalid")).toThrow(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
Comment on lines
+27
to
+33
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Can you think of another invalid value? (related to the number rank)
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Good point! I hadn't considered 0 as an invalid number rank. I've added a test for "0♠". There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. What if a number is passed without any suit? |
||
| // Suggestion: Group the remaining test data into these categories: | ||
| // Number Cards (2-10) | ||
| // Face Cards (J, Q, K) | ||
|
|
@@ -17,4 +39,3 @@ test(`Should return 11 when given an ace card`, () => { | |
| // To learn how to test whether a function throws an error as expected in Jest, | ||
| // please refer to the Jest documentation: | ||
| // https://jestjs.io/docs/expect#tothrowerror | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well done on the order of the logic. By putting the invalid values first it is easy to understand which values are valid. THen you go from smallest to biggest angle which makes it easy to follow
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you.