Release MALT Core v0.0.7 under the malt-core namespace

[BernardLowe]

Summary

• migrate the application-neutral Core module and current imports to github.com/dewebprotocol/malt-core
• document the repository migration while preserving every historical Core tag and Release
• freeze language-neutral Map-proof v1 and client-root v1 conformance corpora for KZG and IPA
• make native Go and browser/WASM gates consume the same checked-in corpus bytes
• bind Resolve/Read, Map-proof, and client-root corpus digests into release provenance
• prepare final v0.0.7 release notes, policy, security, and reproducible asset metadata

Compatibility

This is a pre-v1 Go module namespace change. Relative to v0.0.7-rc.5, existing protocol schemas, Resolve/Read corpus bytes, roots, CIDs, commitment parameters, transcripts, proofs, ProofLists, mutations, receipts, and wire encodings remain unchanged. The new Map-proof and client-root conformance envelopes do not revise their enclosed wire profiles.

Historical tags and Releases remain immutable in the renamed DeWebProtocol/malt-core repository.

Verification

• go test ./...
• GOARCH=386 go test ./auth/commitment/kzg ./auth/commitment/ipa
• sh scripts/test-verifier-wasm-vectors.sh
  • 49 Resolve/Read + 14 Map-proof vectors for all backends
  • 25 Resolve/Read + 7 Map-proof vectors per selected backend
• sh scripts/test-writer-wasm.sh
  • 1 exact accepted + 4 rejected client-root vectors per backend/profile target
  • Worker lifecycle tests
• go vet ./...
• go build -buildvcs=false ./...
• two v0.0.7 release builds under different ambient environments and umasks were byte-identical
• scripts/check-wasm-release.sh passed
• adversarial archive validation rejected 7 self-consistent non-canonical archives
• temporary external module compiled against the new module path

Four independent review passes were used. The final review of dc03cf6ff77e55f0bddc8a3d904a44d91e63adf8 reported no actionable findings.

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.