Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade vitest from 4.1.2 to 4.1.6#39

Open
Dustin4444 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-4367acd569f2d75ee73bb7a27538b5c2
Open

[Snyk] Security upgrade vitest from 4.1.2 to 4.1.6#39
Dustin4444 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
snyk-fix-4367acd569f2d75ee73bb7a27538b5c2

Conversation

@Dustin4444

@Dustin4444 Dustin4444 commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue
critical severity Cross-site Scripting (XSS)
SNYK-JS-VITEST-17120487

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Cross-site Scripting (XSS)


This change is Reviewable

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-VITEST-17120487
@changeset-bot

changeset-bot Bot commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 9ad35ea

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🏷️ Required labels (at least one) (1)
  • 'feature'

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 1da5d597-7f17-4a04-9a9d-f1e676e6ef0f

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch snyk-fix-4367acd569f2d75ee73bb7a27538b5c2

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@snyk-io

snyk-io Bot commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
🔚 Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@snyk-io

snyk-io Bot commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the vitest dependency in package.json to a hardcoded version of 4.1.6. The reviewer recommends reverting this change to maintain the use of pnpm catalogs (catalog:devTools) and updating the version in the catalog definition instead.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

Comment thread package.json
"typescript": "catalog:devTools",
"typescript-eslint": "catalog:devTools",
"vitest": "catalog:devTools",
"vitest": "4.1.6",

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The project uses pnpm catalogs (e.g., catalog:devTools) to manage shared dependency versions across the monorepo. Hardcoding "vitest": "4.1.6" here bypasses the catalog. The vitest version should instead be updated within the catalog definition (typically in pnpm-workspace.yaml), and this file should continue to use "catalog:devTools".

Suggested change
"vitest": "4.1.6",
"vitest": "catalog:devTools",

@kilo-code-bot

kilo-code-bot Bot commented Jun 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Code Review Summary

Status: 1 Issue Found | Recommendation: Address before merge

Overview

Severity Count
CRITICAL 0
WARNING 1
SUGGESTION 0
Issue Details (click to expand)

WARNING

File Line Issue
pnpm-workspace.yaml 34 The vitest catalog version is ^4.0.15 but the PR hardcodes 4.1.6 in the root package.json. This creates inconsistency - other packages still use catalog:devTools which may not resolve to the patched version. Recommend updating the catalog to ^4.1.6 instead of hardcoding, or applying the same hardening across all packages. See existing Gemini Code Assist review for this same point.
Other Observations (not in diff)

Issues found in unchanged code that cannot receive inline comments:

  • The root package.json change on line 78 is already covered by an existing comment per the system-provided comment table.
  • No changeset is included, but this is appropriate for a devDependencies-only security upgrade.
Files Reviewed (2 files)
  • package.json - 0 issues (already has existing comment)
  • pnpm-workspace.yaml - 1 issue

Reviewed by laguna-m.1-20260312:free · 494,651 tokens

Review guidance: REVIEW.md from base branch main

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants