Conversation
… estimate The per-pair probit power-curve fit served the paper's reduced-design study and nothing in the pipeline called it. The project no longer fits a power model of its own: the analytical estimate is PerturbPlan's closed form (pysceptre.analytical_power), and the simulation stays the reference. The docs now say it was deleted rather than "not ported", and the two comments that justified joining dispersion and mean by "any covariate model of power" name the closed form instead. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
src/fit_power_curve.R, the per-pair probit power-curve fit. It served the paper's reduced-design study, and nothing in the pipeline called it.docs/pysceptre-backend.mdanddocs/status.md(Step 11) now say it was deleted, rather than "not ported" or live.src/watteg/cli/summarize_power.pyandsrc/summarize_power.R. They justified joining dispersion and mean by "any covariate model of power"; they now name PerturbPlan's closed form. There are no code changes.Why
The project no longer fits a power model of its own. The analytical estimate is PerturbPlan's closed form (
pysceptre.analytical_power), and the simulation stays the reference. The matching removal in WattEG-paper is in progress.Checks
ruff checkandruff format --checkonsrc tests workflowpass.git grep fit_power_curvefinds only the docs lines that now record the deletion.🤖 Generated with Claude Code