Reposition docs around custody serving the court - #6
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR made by x-preview-f from opencode on behalf of Kriday.
Oot now keeps its own history, and the docs still said it never touches a repository. This PR rewrites the story so custody leads: the court governs changes, the store exists to serve it, git stays the interchange format.
Summary:
Calls I made:
adjudicate --changewith no snapshots. Documented exit 1.aboutstring in src/main.rs alone since src/ is off limits on this branch, so binary help and crate description briefly diverge.