-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Address all known vulnerabilities #124
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ | ||
| { | ||
| "name": "@eppo/node-server-sdk", | ||
| "version": "4.0.0", | ||
| "version": "4.0.1", | ||
| "description": "Eppo node server SDK", | ||
| "main": "dist/index.js", | ||
| "files": [ | ||
|
|
@@ -29,38 +29,40 @@ | |
| }, | ||
| "homepage": "https://github.com/Eppo-exp/node-server-sdk#readme", | ||
| "dependencies": { | ||
| "@eppo/js-client-sdk-common": "4.15.2" | ||
| "@eppo/js-client-sdk-common": "^5" | ||
| }, | ||
| "devDependencies": { | ||
| "@google-cloud/storage": "^7.18.0", | ||
| "@microsoft/api-documenter": "^7.28.2", | ||
| "@microsoft/api-extractor": "^7.38.0", | ||
| "@types/express": "^4.17.13", | ||
| "@types/jest": "^29.5.14", | ||
| "@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin": "^5.13.0", | ||
| "@typescript-eslint/parser": "^5.13.0", | ||
| "eslint": "^8.57.1", | ||
| "eslint-config-prettier": "^8.5.0", | ||
| "eslint-import-resolver-typescript": "^2.5.0", | ||
| "eslint-plugin-import": "^2.25.4", | ||
| "eslint-plugin-prettier": "^4.0.0", | ||
| "eslint-plugin-promise": "^6.0.0", | ||
| "express": "^4.22.1", | ||
| "husky": "^6.0.0", | ||
| "jest": "^29.7.0", | ||
| "lint-staged": "^12.3.5", | ||
| "prettier": "^2.2.1", | ||
| "testdouble": "^3.16.4", | ||
| "ts-jest": "^29.4.6", | ||
| "typescript": "^5.4.5" | ||
| "@google-cloud/storage": "^7", | ||
| "@microsoft/api-documenter": "^7.30.5", | ||
| "@microsoft/api-extractor": "^7.58.7", | ||
| "@types/express": "^5", | ||
| "@types/jest": "^30", | ||
| "@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin": "^8", | ||
| "@typescript-eslint/parser": "^8", | ||
| "eslint": "^8", | ||
| "eslint-config-prettier": "^10", | ||
| "eslint-import-resolver-typescript": "^4", | ||
| "eslint-plugin-import": "^2", | ||
| "eslint-plugin-prettier": "^5", | ||
| "eslint-plugin-promise": "^7", | ||
| "express": "^5", | ||
| "husky": "^9", | ||
|
Comment on lines
+35
to
+49
|
||
| "jest": "^30", | ||
| "lint-staged": "^16", | ||
| "prettier": "^3", | ||
| "testdouble": "^3", | ||
| "ts-jest": "^29", | ||
| "typescript": "^5" | ||
| }, | ||
| "engines": { | ||
| "node": ">=20.x", | ||
| "yarn": "1.x" | ||
| }, | ||
| "packageManager": "yarn@1.22.22+sha512.a6b2f7906b721bba3d67d4aff083df04dad64c399707841b7acf00f6b133b7ac24255f2652fa22ae3534329dc6180534e98d17432037ff6fd140556e2bb3137e", | ||
| "resolutions": { | ||
| "minimatch": "^3.1.2", | ||
| "@types/node": "^20.0.0" | ||
| "//@types/node": "Pinned to ^20 to keep the dev type surface aligned with engines.node >=20.x; newer @types/node would let consumer code use APIs that aren't actually available on Node 20", | ||
| "@types/node": "^20.0.0", | ||
| "//@tootallnate/once": "GHSA-rj4j-rrv4-3xc4 (low). Pulled deeply by @google-cloud/storage → teeny-request → http-proxy-agent. The latest @google-cloud/storage (7.19.x) still ships the unpatched chain and there's no newer release; the chain is dev-only (test fixture downloader)", | ||
| "@tootallnate/once": "^3.0.1" | ||
|
Comment on lines
62
to
+66
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. From Claude: the published-package concern is unfounded — What's left after that is a developer-experience consideration: yarn does emit one warning per pseudo-comment key during |
||
| } | ||
| } | ||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Unless we're intentionally allowing downgrades to older versions (I only see versions going up in the
yarn.lock), why are we loosening the lower bounds on these versions, i.e. dropping the minimum minor/patch constraints?