Skip to content

chore: update README#317

Merged
timurbazhirov merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/update-readme
May 17, 2026
Merged

chore: update README#317
timurbazhirov merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/update-readme

Conversation

@VsevolodX
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@VsevolodX VsevolodX commented May 17, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated setup instructions to use Python's built-in virtual environment workflow
    • Reorganized repository contents documentation with clearer hierarchy and improved navigation
    • Added installation options table to choose specific feature sets (API, Materials Designer, Workflows, Development, or Everything)

Review Change Stack

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 17, 2026

Caution

Review failed

Pull request was closed or merged during review

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 433668a0-5ca1-477e-b118-5ce14aa57771

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 38c1137 and 39eec1d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

README.md documentation restructured to organize repository contents into functional sections (API Examples, Materials Designer, Simulation Workflows, utilities) and updated setup instructions to use Python's built-in venv instead of virtualenv, with a new extras-selection table for different notebook use cases.

Changes

Documentation Updates

Layer / File(s) Summary
Repository contents overview
README.md
Contents section reorganized from a flat table into structured subsections covering API Examples, Materials Designer notebooks, simulation workflows, and shared utilities, with updated notebook links and descriptions.
Setup instructions
README.md
Setup section updated to use python -m venv .venv instead of virtualenv, and installation step replaced with a table mapping notebook subsets (API, Materials Designer, Workflows, Everything, Development) to corresponding pip install -e extras.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • timurbazhirov

Poem

A rabbit hopped through the README once,
Rearranged the contents—now it makes sense!
No more virtualenv, venv is the way,
Tables of extras guide users today! 🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'chore: update README' is vague and generic, using a non-descriptive term 'update' without indicating the specific nature of the changes made. Consider using a more specific title that describes the main changes, such as 'chore: restructure README contents and update setup instructions' to better convey the scope of documentation updates.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/update-readme

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@timurbazhirov timurbazhirov merged commit f828635 into main May 17, 2026
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants