Repository navigation
Conversation
|
README redesign evidence for commit Independent code review: APPROVE.
Independent security review: APPROVE.
Prompt eval comparison
Verification
Human Product Owner acceptance remains pending through OMP, Codex CLI, Pi, and GitHub Copilot CLI. Public package/release publication and native Windows acceptance remain gated. |
|
README product redesign update — commit The first candidate was rejected by the Human Product Owner. The revised README now leads with the approved product position:
Observable changes:
Independent review:
Verification:
PR: #29 |
|
FSQ-style README refinement — commit Human Product Owner direction: learn from https://github.com/FSQ-lab/FSQ and leave unavailable media blank until approved assets arrive. Changes:
Verification:
PR: #29 |
|
AutoGenesis brand logo — commit Added original responsive light/dark SVG wordmarks and installed them in the README using Concept:
Verification:
Remaining media intentionally blank: complete-test video, Scenario editorial card, execution capture, and preview/replay evidence. |
|
Scoped Edge deployment evidence — commit Human Product Owner confirmed the authoritative public figures and scope. README now presents only:
The section explicitly attributes these to application of the approach on the Microsoft Edge browser product line and states that they are observed deployment results, not projected savings or a universal benchmark. Conflicting draft figures and all other internal PDF claims were excluded. Verification:
PR: #29 |
|
Edge deployment proof redesign — commit Replaced the plain metric table with a high-impact production-scale panel:
Responsive delivery:
Independent PR: #29 |
|
Edge proof glyph visibility fix — commit The browser/deployment glyph is the top-left mark inside the Edge results panel, immediately before “PROVEN AT PRODUCTION SCALE.” It was too subtle at the original 64/72 px source sizes. Updated source sizes:
Stroke weight, contrast, and header clear space were increased. Published GitHub desktop rendering loads the updated asset at 838×359. Independent |
Requirement
Closes #28
User-visible result
The root README now presents AutoGenesis from the development and QA user's perspective:
It follows the evidence-first landing-page pattern used by FSQ: centered product positioning, status badges, a complete-test media position, a scenario-to-execution-to-result story, scoped Edge deployment evidence, then Quick Start. It explains the full AutoGenesis loop—BDD scenario, real application execution through MCP, observed-call recording, generated-code review, and replay without the Coding Agent—before installation or package mechanics. The visual-model exception, team workflow, four target platforms, and Agent-first path remain explicit.
Scope
Non-goals
Interface changes
The repository landing page is now the product and onboarding interface. The generated
agent-install-prompt.txtadditionally requires exact-plan approval, conflict/shadow detection, installed-byte verification, discovery-path identity, and fresh approval after plan changes. Runtime and package entrypoints are unchanged.Acceptance scenarios
Verification evidence
agent-contract/tests/test_skills.py: 18 passedEdgeImpactPanelReview— APPROVE after the mobile composition was stacked for readable labelsEdgeMetricsReadmeReview— APPROVE against the supplied source and Human Product Owner correctionAutoGenesisLogoReview— APPROVE; legible at desktop, mobile, and 260 px widthsFSQReadmeProductReview— APPROVEFSQReadmeSecurityReview— APPROVE; canonical prompt and safety contracts unchangedAgent roles
FSQReadmeProductReview,AutoGenesisLogoReview,EdgeMetricsReadmeReview, andEdgeImpactPanelReviewsessions — APPROVEFSQReadmeSecurityReviewsession — APPROVESecurity review
The README requires callers to keep arbitrary plaintext credentials out of Feature/task text and explains that AutoGenesis cannot detect arbitrary embedded credentials. The copyable prompt fails closed on unsupported hosts, unapproved activity, digest mismatch, conflicting content, discovery shadowing, transformed installed bytes, or unverifiable Skill resolution. Preview language is limited to the bindings actually enforced: session, payload, destination, and destination base state.
Compatibility impact
No Runtime behavior changes. Coding Agents that cannot prove resolved Skill path/digest/version stop instead of claiming installation success. Replay is accurately described as independent of the Coding Agent; explicitly model-backed visual assertions retain their configured model dependency.
Rollback
Revert this pull request. No user data, package state, Runtime state, or schema migration is involved.
Known limitations
Definition of Done