Skip to content

FIZZL_TRADE_SETUPS: liquid_top and the liquidity rank (0.8.0) - #16

Merged
Fizzl13 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/x402-agents-solana-payments-nceg9b
Sep 27, 2026
Merged

Fizzl13 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/x402-agents-solana-payments-nceg9b

Conversation

@Fizzl13

@Fizzl13 Fizzl13 commented Sep 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Ichimoku /setups now ranks liquidity by global trading volume (thin coins rank lower) and accepts liquid_top: only the N most traded coins (Fizzl13/ichimoku-signal#67). This passes that through.

What

  • parseSetupsInput understands:
    • "liquid", "most traded" or "high volume" → liquid_top: 30;
    • "50 most traded" → 50;
    • or options.liquid_top. Values outside 1–200 are dropped.
  • getTradeSetups sends liquid_top.
  • Each setup line shows liquidity #N, and the header names the filter.
  • Types gain liquidity_rank, liquidity_usd_daily, filters.liquid_top and liquidity_source, all optional, so older answers still parse.
  • The action description and README mention the new option; version 0.8.0.

Tests

New parser cases, plus a paid end-to-end run where "Show me liquid setups only" pays for /setups?interval=4h&liquid_top=30. npm test: 35/35.

After merge

Publish 0.8.0 to npm (trusted publishing, as for 0.7.0).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01TsD5haPKxeWjYmErHzvU48


Generated by Claude Code

Ichimoku /setups now ranks liquidity by global trading volume and accepts
liquid_top (only the N most traded coins). The action passes it on: "liquid"
or "most traded" asks for the 30 most traded coins, "50 most traded" for 50,
or options.liquid_top; out-of-range values are dropped. Each line shows the
coin's liquidity rank, and the header names the filter. Types, description,
README and tests (parser cases and the paid path with liquid_top=30).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TsD5haPKxeWjYmErHzvU48
@Fizzl13
Fizzl13 merged commit 38f1fe2 into main Sep 27, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants