Conversation
Signed-off-by: Carlos Hernandez <carloshvp@gmail.com>
carloshvp
requested review from
GangGreenTemperTatum,
afogel,
bar-capsule,
fewdisc,
mamicidal,
rocklambros and
sclintonowasp
as code owners
September 13, 2026 11:53
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Add a host-level dogfooding report for OpenCode 1.18.30 against the ACS reference Guardian and pinned AGT policy engine. The report includes three evidence captures and an opt-in reproduction fixture for live ALLOW/DENY decisions and established-session Guardian loss under both negotiated failure postures.
The real host executes or rejects harmless marker commands. A local scripted model supplies those commands; the Guardian and policy engine remain unchanged. The captures agree with the specification for this slice, without establishing full ACS-Core conformance.
Which issue does this implement
Contributes to #92, which is labeled
status:acceptedandhelp wanted. This leaves #92 open for further dogfooding reports.Base branch
integration, because this touches reference-implementation documentation and a manual reproduction fixtureType of change
I tested this
integration; tested implementation head7d2dd3c69f82ec7565eef49b1609906deba1ef6buv run pytest -v: 278 passed, 1 skippeduv run mkdocs build --strict: passedbun test: 1,110 passed, 1 skipped;bun run typecheck: passedbun run verify:pin: 5 passed, including upstream Rego byte identitygit diff --check: passedThe Python skip requires a case-sensitive filesystem. The Bun suite's skipped pin test requires
UPSTREAM_BUNDLE;verify:pinsupplied the upstream bundle and passed that check separately. The manual host fixture is outside CI because it requires an installed OpenCode host.Checklist
Signed-off-byline viagit commit -sSTYLE.mdSecurity
The fixture uses a scratch directory, loopback servers, a local scripted model, and harmless file markers. It stops only the Guardian process it starts. It does not change production behavior or report a new vulnerability. The report retains the reference implementation's documented authentication and conformance limits; its local logs are not independent attestation.