Skip to content

Document OntoJIT as ESKA related work - #96

Merged
GerhardBalz-Admin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/add-ontojit-related-work
Aug 24, 2026
Merged

Document OntoJIT as ESKA related work#96
GerhardBalz-Admin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/add-ontojit-related-work

Conversation

@GerhardBalz-Admin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Adds a focused OntoJIT related-work note based on the reviewed Private SKE analysis.

Main points

  • positions OntoJIT as a historical ontology-to-executable-code precedent rather than as equivalent to ESKA;
  • explains the developer/runtime motivation: bring OWL semantics into a conventional C#/CLR environment;
  • distinguishes generated C# + semantic meta-properties from the OntoJIT semantic runtime/inference support required to interpret semantics not supplied by ordinary CLR behavior;
  • treats the Pizza CWA/OWA divergence as a runtime semantic choice/limitation, not an inevitable consequence of compiling OWL to C#;
  • derives the ESKA lesson that semantic continuity depends on both the projected representation and the semantics of the runtime interpreting it;
  • preserves the reviewed boundary that ImplementationProjection is optional in ESKA generally and is used here only to describe the OntoJIT translated path.

Sources

Uses stable DOI references for the OntoJIT papers and Selena Baset's thesis.

Boundary

Documentation only. No ESKA/SMO vocabulary, runtime, executable example, release, or immutable artifact is changed. No contact/outreach content is published.

Related private analysis: GerhardBalz/semantic-knowledge-engineering-private#26 / PR #31.

@GerhardBalz-Admin
GerhardBalz-Admin marked this pull request as ready for review August 24, 2026 21:26
@GerhardBalz-Admin
GerhardBalz-Admin merged commit a6422ed into main Aug 24, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant