Revise Provenance Issues#6
Open
egrace479 wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
Include dataset names and links to them (with clarification of how they're referenced here).
Member
Author
|
@SMRayeed, let's get the Citation and source dataset link fixes I made merged (please review), and you can open a new PR with the Todo:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR works to resolve provenance issues in the repository presentation:
[TODO]: It is unclear how to reproduce the work done here due to alignment issues within the included metadata and notebooks, including references to files that don't seem to be publicly available (see issue Provenance of CanonBeetles.csv #4 & Alignment to Original Source datasets for Reproducibility #5 discussions). This needs to be resolved for reusability and reproducibility of this work.