nix: migrate fetchPnpmDeps

[Desoroxxx]

This fixes a warning see: NixOS/nixpkgs#494184

Did not do it for Darwin as I do not have access to that platform.

[Inrixia]

Could you do it for all platforms anyway? If it breaks something can revert

[Desoroxxx]

Could you do it for all platforms anyway? If it breaks something can revert

I am still new to nix so I might be completely wrong here, but as far as I know there is no real way for me to actually do it, I won't be able to get the real hash and it will simply fail.

[Inrixia]

Ah, @ojsef39, @frostplexx, @xaiyadev

[xaiyadev]

You can get the hash on linux too.
If nobody touches this until this evening I will fix it up ^^

Also: you could just change the fetcherversion, then push it and the pipeline will update the hash itself

[frostplexx]

The same treatment is needed for Darwin too. Although I think you need macOS to generate its pnpm hash?

I can open a separate PR that applies the same change to Darwin if @Desoroxxx is unable to do it :)

[Desoroxxx]

You can get the hash on linux too. If nobody touches this until this evening I will fix it up ^^

How? I tried looking but haven't found anything like that or at least it wasn't really clear, I am fine with you pointing to a doc page.

Also: you could just change the fetcherversion, then push it and the pipeline will update the hash itself

Oh well, that simplifies things lol

[Desoroxxx]

If the pipeline does update the hash it should just work for both now

[Inrixia]

Happy to merge this once it's been resolved. I don't use nix so can't help much here 💜

[frostplexx]

LGTM then

[Inrixia]

Good to merge?

[xaiyadev]

Is there a way to a run a test pipeline kn this branch?
Not really familiar with github actions but I know this is possible on bitbucket, could we maybe try that first?

Oterwise LGTM

[Inrixia]

Someone should do a seperate pr to add a workflow to run the build and tests on pr changes.

Otherwise it won't run atm.

I think technically @Desoroxxx could try manually run on their branch but I wouldn't reccomend it over the solution above.