Upgraded config for FlyingBear P905H

[rumatoest]

Description

Took latest configuration files and ported P905H options there.

Tried to to make printer work faster while preserving decent quality.

Benefits

Print speed could be up to 90mm/s with linear advance enabled.

Related Issues

On higher speeds >= 90mm/s or similar linear advance makes printer periodically stuck - CPU is to slow for this fancy calculations. Turning linear advance K factor to 0 allows to print on 100mm/s and above.

[ellensp]

You cannot drop Marlin 2.1.2.8 configs "CONFIGURATION_H_VERSION 02010208" over import 2.1.x "CONFIGURATION_H_VERSION 02010300" configs

Thats like using imperial parts in a metric system.. it just doesn't fit (it actually undoes all changes since 2.1.2.8 onwards)

[Nuck-TH]

To contribute configs here, they are needed to be made for and tested on bugfix-2.1.x code. 2.1.2.x is several years old at this point, point releases are sporadic bugfixes, not core upgrades.

[rumatoest]

You cannot drop Marlin 2.1.2.8 configs "CONFIGURATION_H_VERSION 02010208" over import 2.1.x "CONFIGURATION_H_VERSION 02010300" configs

Thats like using imperial parts in a metric system.. it just doesn't fit (it actually undoes all changes since 2.1.2.8 onwards)

Ok I just wanted to upgrade existing 2.1.2.8 configuration but bugfix PR was not the solution.
Are you saying that configuration template for import 2.1.x is different compared to 2.1.2.8 ?

[rumatoest]

To contribute configs here, they are needed to be made for and tested on bugfix-2.1.x code. 2.1.2.x is several years old at this point, point releases are sporadic bugfixes, not core upgrades.

I've tried bugfix but PR was automatically closed.
Ok I guess I have to try the latest firmware and redo config again.

[ellensp]

CI error is "Configuration.h:284:11: error: missing binary operator before token "("
#if EITHER(PARKING_EXTRUDER, MAGNETIC_PARKING_EXTRUDER)"

This is because Marco EITHER and BOTH was removed from newer Marlins and replaced with ANY and ALL
Some 3 years ago MarlinFirmware/Marlin#25908

[rumatoest]

Wait a moment "Marlin 2.1.2.8" released not so long ago.
I understand that 2.1.3.x is different but it is still in beta.
I've tried to update exact 2.1.2.x but my PR was auto closed #1194

The bot says "Please redo this PR starting with the current import-2.1.x branch "

The main question is:
Does it mean that 2.1.3 configurations are backward compatible with 2.1.2.8 ?

[Nuck-TH]

It doesn't matter when it was released, it is several years old code.
Releaes are nothing more than relatively arbitrary snapshots of (currently) bugfix-2.1.x branch. They generally shouldn't be used, because they only thing they are really good at is becoming outdated fast.

Again, to contribute here you don't run releases, but bugfix-2.1.x. Configurations aren't backward or forward compatible verbatim.

[rumatoest]

@Nuck-TH @ellensp Thanks for pointing our to my PR issues.
Guess I fixed everything.

[thinkyhead]

Thanks for the config updates! Improved tuning benefits everyone, not only here on Earth but for all residents of our future planetary colonies.