Fence Optimize against late recovery intents#347
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What & why
Close the recovery TOCTOU between the initial sidecar probe and Optimize effects. Every main table-pointer publish also advances the shared graph head, so a late recovery intent on another main table must fence Optimize too.
Optimize now acquires the process-local main branch gate, relists recovery state under that gate, rejects main-target intents plus graph-global SchemaApply, and retains the gate through the internally parallel table phase and final physical manifest compaction.
Backing issue / RFC
Checklist
Notes for reviewers
The intentionally coarse legacy-adapter tradeoff is that same-process sidecar-enrolled main writers wait for the graph-wide Optimize run. Optimize table tasks remain parallel, and reads do not take this gate. This is process-local coordination, not a distributed lock; cross-process safety remains Lance OCC plus recovery classification.
Deterministic failpoint coverage proves:
Verification:
Greptile Summary
This PR fences Optimize against late recovery intents on the main branch. The main changes are:
__manifestcompaction.Confidence Score: 5/5
This looks safe to merge.
Important Files Changed
Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "Preserve manifest compaction after table..." | Re-trigger Greptile
Context used: