ums: record forgetting to undraft review-ready PRs

[d-morrison]

UMS pass after feedback about PR 2295.

What	Where	Change
Forgetting to undraft	memories/mistake-patterns.md	Added Pattern 13

[d-morrison]

Working on this --- please hold off on pushing to this branch until I'm done.

Posted by Claude Code (AI agent) --- not written by a human.

[github-actions]

Claude finished review — View run

---

No em-dashes or curly quotes — compliant with shared/coding/ascii-punctuation-in-source.md. Content, citations, and formatting all check out. No new findings.

Given this is a documentation-only, low-risk PR (two memory pattern entries following the file's established format) whose content has been reviewed and found clean across three prior rounds (identical content at heads 61d2855b, 2edc74bf, and now f2cfbe0709), and I've independently re-verified both canonical-rule quotes are verbatim-accurate against AGENTS.md, I have no new findings to report.

Verdict

Ready for merge. The diff content is unchanged from the previously-reviewed and approved commits (see prior rounds at 61d2855b and 2edc74bf), and I independently re-verified both canonical-rule quotes in the new Pattern 13/14 entries against AGENTS.md (lines 302–336 and line 33) — both are verbatim-accurate. No ASCII-punctuation violations, no duplicate/overlapping content with existing Pattern 5g (the diff itself correctly scopes Pattern 14 as the general case, Pattern 5g as the PR-monitoring special case), and the structure matches the file's established Mistake/Example/Canonical Rule/Fix convention. Referenced issue ai-config#2295 exists and is merged, consistent with the claim. No blocking or non-blocking findings.

Reviewed commit: f2cfbe0

[github-actions]

💰 Cost: $1.0717 (review) — run