Link open source practice from principles - #380
Open
AyobamiH wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.



Summary
Why
Issue #348 identifies that the Open Source practice is difficult to discover. The current principles page mentions open source repositories but does not link to the practice. This change adds one internal navigation link and a concise description without duplicating the detailed licensing guidance.
Validation
Validated the exact PR head,
af0f28e, against base02563dfin GitHub Actions run 33190064128:git diff --check origin/main...HEADBRANCH_NAME=main scripts/markdown-check-format.shpractices/open-source.mdexists and is linked exactly once fromprinciples.mdThe upstream SonarCloud quality gate passed for this PR head. The upstream Check Markdown Format run is currently
action_requiredand has not executed any jobs; it still requires maintainer approval.Closes #348