🛡️ Sentinel: [MEDIUM] Fix bare except vulnerability - #44
Conversation
Co-authored-by: NoWon1 <126711057+NoWon1@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
🚨 Severity: MEDIUM
💡 Vulnerability: Bare
except:blocks within nested loops swallow all system-level exceptions, includingKeyboardInterruptandSystemExit.🎯 Impact: In long-running simulation loops, swallowing
KeyboardInterruptprevents graceful termination, leading to a localized Denial of Service and making debugging nearly impossible when errors occur deep within spatial lookups.🔧 Fix: Replaced bare
except:blocks withexcept Exception:to only catch standard program errors while allowing critical system signals to propagate to the Python runtime. Also added a static analysis script (test_security.py) leveraging theastmodule to prevent bare excepts moving forward.✅ Verification: Ensure the automated
test_security.pyscript passes (run viapython -m pytest test_security.py).PR created automatically by Jules for task 4614801728459202482 started by @NoWon1