Skip to content

release: prepare the reviewed 0.1.0 first-public-release unlock - #79

Open
CompleteDotTech wants to merge 4 commits into
OpenCoven:mainfrom
CompleteDotTech:recreate/release-sdk-0.1.0-unlock-41
Open

release: prepare the reviewed 0.1.0 first-public-release unlock#79
CompleteDotTech wants to merge 4 commits into
OpenCoven:mainfrom
CompleteDotTech:recreate/release-sdk-0.1.0-unlock-41

Conversation

@CompleteDotTech

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Recreated from CompleteDotTech/sdk#5 as a delta-only branch against current upstream main (66edd4d). The separate security-review document from fork PR #1 is intentionally carried by upstream #76, and the fork-only workflow_dispatch bootstrap was omitted.

This preparatory artifact advances #41: it records the pending authorization decision, folds the two pre-release changesets into the fixed 0.1.0 changelogs, opens the repository publication lock while preserving protected-environment/OIDC/prepublish gates, and adds the no-publish rehearsal runbook. Nothing is tagged, published, unlocked externally, or dispatched by this PR.

Dependencies remain explicit: #74 for the conformance/release contract and #76 for the security review. Because #74 is an open parallel evolution of the release configuration, this branch is intentionally based on current main; it must be rebased and conflict-reviewed after #74 merges before release approval.

Validation: the changed release/readiness/policy suites pass 35/35 locally (with the repository's required Node 24.18.0-24.x range to be enforced by CI); git diff --check is clean. The authorization record explicitly remains pending fresh maintainer authorization.

…ernance evidence

Prepare the OpenCoven#41 release authorization record with the decision marked
pending fresh maintainer authorization: fixed-group version 0.1.0, the
four-package set with dev-cli deferred (OpenCoven#37/OpenCoven#57), the Node/OS/architecture
matrix, launch criteria, and a rollback owner proposal. Gather governance
prerequisite evidence from repository config, workflow files, live read-only
GitHub API state (protected npm-release environment with required reviewers),
and the maintainer's recorded 2026-08-28 audit, and list every item that
requires maintainer confirmation. No external mutation is authorized.
Run the canonical 'pnpm release:version' on the fixed group: the two pending
changesets (the OpenCoven#68 managed-native custody summary and the empty bootstrap
placeholder) are consumed, the four release packages stay at exactly 0.1.0
with exact workspace:0.1.0 internal ranges, and the managed-native custody
and browser-safe subpath summaries are folded into the '## 0.1.0' changelog
entries of @opencoven/sdk-core and @opencoven/cave-client so the first
published release notes describe everything 0.1.0 ships. No version bump is
pending after this commit.
Deliberately open the repository publication lock for the 0.1.0 first public
release: release.config.json sets publishingEnabled to true and the four
release package manifests become publishable, while the second, independent
deployment lock (the protected npm-release environment approval), the OIDC
id-token/attestation requirements, the prepublishOnly authorization gate,
and the no-token-fallback rule are preserved unchanged. Update the tests
that pinned the closed state to pin the reviewed open state instead
(readiness summary, publish-path gating, artifact-before-npm ordering,
token-fallback rejection, both sides of the privacy lock), and align the
README and RELEASING.md release-status language. This change activates
nothing: no tag, no publish, no dispatch.
Write the exact operator procedure for the annotated sdk-v0.1.0 tag at the
reviewed commit, release-workflow verify mode, artifact retention and digest
comparison with the reviewed candidate, and the registry-unchanged proof,
with every external action behind an explicit authorization stop. Document
the authorization-gated continuation (issue steps 5-7: one-time bootstrap
publish, trusted publishing, registry/provenance validation) with acceptance
checks, record the reviewed candidate artifact digests and the local
non-mutating dry-run evidence, and state the master authorization sentence.
No tag was created and no workflow was dispatched.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant