Skip to content

feat(integrations): add Pilot Protocol - #536

Open
TeoSlayer wants to merge 1 commit into
OpenHands:mainfrom
TeoSlayer:codex/add-pilot-integration
Open

feat(integrations): add Pilot Protocol#536
TeoSlayer wants to merge 1 commit into
OpenHands:mainfrom
TeoSlayer:codex/add-pilot-integration

Conversation

@TeoSlayer

@TeoSlayer TeoSlayer commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
  • A human has tested these changes.

Why

OpenHands users can run Pilot Protocol as a local stdio MCP server without credentials, but it is not available in the integration catalog.

Summary

  • Add a Pilot Protocol catalog entry
  • Configure the published pilotprotocol-mcp package over stdio
  • Regenerate the integration catalog index

Issue Number

Related catalog infrastructure: #241

Submission request: #537

How to Test

  1. Run uv run --group test pytest tests/ -q.
  2. Open the OpenHands integration marketplace and install Pilot Protocol.
  3. Confirm the server starts and exposes pilot_search and pilot_peers.

Automated result: 801 passed, 24 skipped.

Video/Screenshots

Not applicable for the catalog data change.

Notes

Disclosure: I contribute to Pilot Protocol. AI-assisted; reviewed and validated against the repository schema and test suite.

HUMAN: No manual UI test was performed. The repository test suite, both synchronization checks, generated integration index, schema validation, and Claude plugin validation were run locally; the exact results are recorded above.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the type: feat A new feature label Sep 4, 2026
@TeoSlayer
TeoSlayer marked this pull request as ready for review September 4, 2026 21:50
@all-hands-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 This PR needs a couple of things fixed before OpenHands can review it:

  • the PR description's HUMAN: section needs at least 20 characters describing what you tested, not just the template placeholder

Push an update once this is addressed and this check re-runs automatically.

This is an automated check - no AI was used to generate this comment.

@TeoSlayer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

The latest PR Description Check now passes. The required test, sync-extensions, and validate-claude-code workflows are awaiting first-time fork approval (action_required). I ran their commands locally: 801 tests passed, 24 skipped; both sync checks passed; all bundled plugins passed Claude validation. Could a maintainer approve the fork workflows?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

type: feat A new feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants