[CI] (e2f7ab0) astro/astro-hybrid-marketing#2417
Closed
wizard-ci-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Author
|
Now I have all the context needed. Let me produce the evaluation. PR Evaluation ReportSummaryThis PR integrates PostHog into an Astro hybrid marketing site (NeuralFlow AI) using both a client-side HTML snippet component (
Confidence score: 4/5 👍
File changes
App sanity check
|
| Criteria | Result | Description |
|---|---|---|
| App builds and runs | Yes | No syntax errors; inline scripts and imports are valid |
| Preserves existing env vars & configs | Yes | Existing app code untouched; only PostHog additions |
| No syntax or type errors | Yes | All TypeScript and Astro syntax is valid |
| Correct imports/exports | Yes | posthog-node import in server lib, component imports in layout correct |
| Minimal, focused changes | Yes | All changes are PostHog-related |
| Pre-existing issues | None | Base app appears functional |
Issues
- No
.env.examplefile:PUBLIC_POSTHOG_PROJECT_TOKENandPUBLIC_POSTHOG_HOSTare required environment variables but no.env.exampleor equivalent documentation is committed. The setup report mentions this as a TODO but it should have been included. [MEDIUM] - Unnecessary
posthog-jsdependency:posthog-jsis added topackage.jsonbut never imported — the client-side integration uses the HTML script tag snippet exclusively. This adds unnecessary bundle weight. [LOW]
Other completed criteria
- All changes are PostHog-related (no unrelated edits)
- Correct files modified for Astro framework (component, layout, pages, server lib)
- Code follows existing codebase patterns (inline scripts, Astro component conventions)
.envadded to.gitignore- Build configuration (package.json) is valid
PostHog implementation ⚠️
| Criteria | Result | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PostHog SDKs installed | Yes | posthog-js and posthog-node in package.json; client uses HTML snippet (script tag approach) |
| PostHog client initialized | Yes | Snippet in posthog.astro with is:inline, included in Layout <head>. Server singleton in posthog-server.ts |
| capture() | Yes | 7 meaningful events across pages (CTAs, page views, form submissions) |
| identify() | No | Uses raw email as distinct_id on both client and server, causing fragmented data |
| Error tracking | No | Client-side captureException is correct, but server-side captureException(error, 'anonymous') uses incorrect posthog-node API signature |
| Reverse proxy | No | Not configured; snippet loads directly from PostHog API host |
Issues
- Email as
distinct_id:posthog.identify(data.email, { name: data.name })on the client andposthog.identify({ distinctId: data.email, ... })on the server both use the raw email address as the distinct ID. This creates fragmented user profiles — the anonymous session events captured before identification won't properly merge on the server side, and email is not a stable identifier. Use a database user ID instead, and pass email only as a person property. [CRITICAL] - Server-side
captureExceptionAPI mismatch:getPostHogServer().captureException(error as Error, 'anonymous')— theposthog-nodeSDK'scaptureExceptiondoes not accept(error, distinctId)as arguments. This call will likely throw or silently fail. For server-side error capture, useposthog.capture({ distinctId: '...', event: '', properties: { : error.message, ... } })or ensure you're using the correct posthog-node error tracking API. [MEDIUM] - Reverse proxy not configured: No proxy setup to route PostHog requests through the app's domain. Client-side tracking is vulnerable to ad blockers. [MEDIUM]
- Outdated
defaultsdate: The snippet usesdefaults: '2026-01-30'while the latest documented value is'2026-05-30'. [LOW] - Older snippet version: The script tag uses
s.api_host+"/static/array.js"instead of the newer pattern that routes through the assets origin (s.api_host.replace(".i.posthog.com", "-assets.i.posthog.com") + "/static/array.js"). [LOW]
Other completed criteria
- API key loaded from environment variable (
PUBLIC_POSTHOG_PROJECT_TOKEN) - Host correctly configured with fallback to
https://us.i.posthog.com is:inlinedirective used correctly on all PostHog script tags per Astro rulesPUBLIC_prefix used for client-side env vars per Astro conventions- PostHog component imported in Layout and applied to all pages
- Server-side singleton pattern with
flushAt: 1for immediate flushing - Session ID passed from client to server via custom header
PostHog insights and events ⚠️
| Filename | PostHog events | Description |
|---|---|---|
src/pages/index.astro |
free_trial_cta_clicked, contact_sales_clicked |
Hero CTA button clicks with location: 'hero' property |
src/components/Navigation.astro |
nav_cta_clicked |
Navigation "Get Started" button click with location: 'navigation' |
src/pages/pricing.astro |
pricing_page_viewed, pricing_plan_cta_clicked |
Page view event and plan CTA clicks with plan property (starter/pro/enterprise) |
src/pages/contact.astro |
contact_form_submitted, captureException |
Form submission with interest and has_company properties; client-side error capture |
src/pages/api/contact.ts |
contact_form_received, captureException |
Server-side form receipt with interest, has_company, source properties; server-side error capture (incorrect API) |
Issues
- No PII concerns in capture events: Events correctly keep PII (email, name) in
identify()person properties only and use non-PII properties (interest,has_company,plan,location) in capture calls. However, theidentify()distinct_id issue described above still applies. [CRITICAL — covered above]
Other completed criteria
- Events represent real user actions mapped to actual product flows (CTA clicks, page views, form submissions)
- Events enable product insights — can build funnels: pricing_page_viewed → pricing_plan_cta_clicked → contact_form_submitted → contact_form_received
- Events include relevant contextual properties (plan name, location, interest type, has_company)
- No PII in event properties — email and name only in person properties via identify()
- Event names are descriptive, consistent snake_case convention
Reviewed by wizard workbench PR evaluator
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Automated wizard CI run
Source: wizard-pr
Trigger ID:
e2f7ab0App:
astro/astro-hybrid-marketingApp directory:
apps/astro/astro-hybrid-marketingWorkbench branch:
wizard-ci-e2f7ab0-astro-astro-hybrid-marketingWizard branch:
release-please--branches--main--components--wizardContext Mill branch:
mainPostHog (MCP) branch:
masterTimestamp: 2026-07-06T21:58:47.572Z
Duration: 413.7s
YARA Scanner