Feat/GitHub achievements showcase

[ramlal-01]

📌 Related Issue

Closes #1066

✨ What’s Added

Implemented a fully functional GitHub Achievements showcase on the public DevTrack profile page.

The new section displays real GitHub achievements such as:

• Pull Shark
• YOLO
• Pair Extraordinaire
• etc.

🚀 Features Implemented

• Added reusable GitHubAchievements component

• Integrated achievements section into public profile page

• Fetches real GitHub achievement data

• Added achievement badge cards with:

  • badge image
  • title
  • hover tooltip
  • external GitHub profile linking

• Preserved existing DevTrack UI/theme and responsiveness

• Added graceful loading/error/empty states

• Added DB caching + sync integration for achievements

• Refreshes achievements during user sync flow

🛠 Technical Changes

• Added GitHub achievements fetching utility
• Added Supabase migration/schema updates for caching achievements
• Integrated achievements into existing profile architecture
• Maintained strict TypeScript compatibility
• No mock data used

📷 Screenshots

✅ Verification

• Achievements render correctly
• Works on public profile page
• Responsive layout verified
• Existing theme preserved
• Real GitHub achievements fetched successfully
• Database sync/caching implemented

[vercel]

@ramlal-01 is attempting to deploy a commit to the PRIYANSHU DOSHI's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[github-actions]

GSSoC Label Checklist 🏷️

@Priyanshu-byte-coder — please apply the appropriate labels before merging:

Difficulty (pick one):

• level:beginner — 20 pts
• level:intermediate — 35 pts
• level:advanced — 55 pts
• level:critical — 80 pts

Quality (optional):

• quality:clean — ×1.2 multiplier
• quality:exceptional — ×1.5 multiplier

Validation (required to score):

• gssoc:approved — counts for points
• gssoc:invalid / gssoc:spam / gssoc:ai-slop — does not score

Type labels (type:*) are auto-detected from files and title. Review and adjust if needed.
Points formula: (difficulty × quality_multiplier) + type_bonus

[ramlal-01]

Hi @Priyanshu-byte-coder
The feature has been implemented and all CI checks are passing now ✅
Kindly review the PR when possible. Thank you!

[Priyanshu-byte-coder]

Merge conflict after several PRs landed on main — likely on e2e/landing.spec.js or a shared component. Rebase to unblock:

git fetch origin && git rebase origin/main
# resolve conflicts, then:
git push --force-with-lease

All CI checks look good otherwise — once rebased this is ready to merge.

[ramlal-01]

Rebased the branch with latest main and resolved the merge conflict in e2e/landing.spec.js by keeping the updated assertions from main.

My feature changes remain intact, and the branch is now aligned with the latest upstream state.

Noticed that several recent commits on main are also currently failing CI checks, so the remaining failures may be related to ongoing upstream instability rather than this PR specifically.

Requesting re-review once CI stabilizes. 🚀

[ramlal-01]

Latest main updates merged successfully and CI checks are now passing. Ready for review 🚀
@Priyanshu-byte-coder

[github-actions]

🎉 Merged! Thanks for contributing to DevTrack.

If the project has been useful to you, a ⭐ star on the repo is the easiest way to support it — it helps DevTrack get discovered by more developers.

Keep an eye on open issues for your next contribution!