Skip to content

chore: dismiss Dependabot review requests#134

Merged
Pigbibi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/dismiss-dependabot-review-requests
Jul 20, 2026
Merged

chore: dismiss Dependabot review requests#134
Pigbibi merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
agent/dismiss-dependabot-review-requests

Conversation

@Pigbibi

@Pigbibi Pigbibi commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What changed

  • dismiss Pigbibi review requests automatically generated for Dependabot PRs
  • recognize both dependabot[bot] and app/dependabot identities
  • require the review-request event actor to be Dependabot
  • re-check the latest Pigbibi review-request actor from the PR timeline immediately before deletion
  • preserve later or concurrent review requests made by maintainers
  • keep concurrent review-request runs instead of cancelling the matching cleanup
  • use pull_request_target with metadata-only GitHub API access and no checkout

Why

These repositories already auto-merge eligible non-major Dependabot updates after CI, but CODEOWNERS creates redundant review notifications. Event-actor and timeline checks let the workflow remove only bot-generated requests without touching human review requests, including race conditions while a run is queued.

Validation

  • verified automatic CODEOWNERS timeline actor on a historical Dependabot PR
  • verified both supported Dependabot identities
  • verified requested reviewer, event actor, and latest timeline actor conditions
  • verified API errors fail instead of being treated as no match
  • verified no checkout or execution of PR code
  • bash syntax check
  • git diff --check

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Codex PR Review

Merge allowed: 1 finding(s) reported but none are blocking

ℹ️ Other Findings

1. 🟡 [MEDIUM] Reliability in .github/workflows/dependabot_review_request_cleanup.yml

The restore branch can fail on a benign race. If the workflow deletes Pigbibi's Dependabot-generated request, and then a maintainer re-requests Pigbibi before this step runs, latest_review_request_actor becomes human so the job enters the restore branch, but the reviewer may already be requested again. In that case gh api --method POST .../requested_reviewers can return a validation error for an already-requested reviewer, causing the workflow to fail even though the correct final state is already present. (line 68)

Suggestion: Before the POST, re-check the current reviewRequests list and skip the restore if Pigbibi is already requested, or handle the specific 'already requested' API error as success.


Review by Codex PR Review bot • PR

@Pigbibi
Pigbibi force-pushed the agent/dismiss-dependabot-review-requests branch 3 times, most recently from cdb6c69 to 7e49c33 Compare July 20, 2026 06:01

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 7e49c330fc

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/workflows/dependabot_review_request_cleanup.yml Outdated
@Pigbibi
Pigbibi force-pushed the agent/dismiss-dependabot-review-requests branch from 7e49c33 to a727600 Compare July 20, 2026 06:04
@Pigbibi
Pigbibi enabled auto-merge (squash) July 20, 2026 06:08
@Pigbibi
Pigbibi force-pushed the agent/dismiss-dependabot-review-requests branch from a727600 to 78b42dd Compare July 20, 2026 06:11

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 78b42dde8d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/workflows/dependabot_review_request_cleanup.yml
@Pigbibi
Pigbibi force-pushed the agent/dismiss-dependabot-review-requests branch from 78b42dd to 811db67 Compare July 20, 2026 06:14

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 811db67c18

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread .github/workflows/dependabot_review_request_cleanup.yml Outdated
Co-Authored-By: Codex <noreply@openai.com>
@Pigbibi
Pigbibi force-pushed the agent/dismiss-dependabot-review-requests branch from 811db67 to 6baebc8 Compare July 20, 2026 06:19
@Pigbibi
Pigbibi merged commit dda7a28 into main Jul 20, 2026
3 checks passed
@Pigbibi
Pigbibi deleted the agent/dismiss-dependabot-review-requests branch July 20, 2026 06:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant